Delivering Results for Canadians: Improving the Contributions of Enabling Functions

IF 1.1 4区 管理学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Robert P. Shepherd, Eric Champagne
{"title":"Delivering Results for Canadians: Improving the Contributions of Enabling Functions","authors":"Robert P. Shepherd,&nbsp;Eric Champagne","doi":"10.1111/capa.12600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Implementing a results-oriented management system has been a long-term goal and a challenge for federal public sector organizations in Canada. This article highlights the efforts by the Government of Canada to improve performance measurement, evaluation, and audit (PMEA) functions over time. The article traces administrative reforms since 2000, highlighting the shift from inputs and outputs towards a results-focused environment aimed at achieving outcomes. However, even after many reforms and goodwill, there remain gaps among the senior policymakers regarding the meaning of “results for Canadians.” The article points out that siloed approaches by function have led to isolated practices and inefficiencies in data sharing and reporting for effectively supporting decision-making. Although individual functions have improved, implementing a comprehensive results-focused management architecture continues to pose a significant challenge. The article proposes steps to enhance the effectiveness of PMEA functions, emphasizing the need to integrate functions to enhance public services, decision-making, and institutional learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":46145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","volume":"67 4","pages":"585-597"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/capa.12600","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.12600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementing a results-oriented management system has been a long-term goal and a challenge for federal public sector organizations in Canada. This article highlights the efforts by the Government of Canada to improve performance measurement, evaluation, and audit (PMEA) functions over time. The article traces administrative reforms since 2000, highlighting the shift from inputs and outputs towards a results-focused environment aimed at achieving outcomes. However, even after many reforms and goodwill, there remain gaps among the senior policymakers regarding the meaning of “results for Canadians.” The article points out that siloed approaches by function have led to isolated practices and inefficiencies in data sharing and reporting for effectively supporting decision-making. Although individual functions have improved, implementing a comprehensive results-focused management architecture continues to pose a significant challenge. The article proposes steps to enhance the effectiveness of PMEA functions, emphasizing the need to integrate functions to enhance public services, decision-making, and institutional learning.

为加拿大人提供成果:改进赋能职能的贡献
实施面向结果的管理制度是加拿大联邦公共部门组织的一项长期目标和挑战。本文重点介绍了加拿大政府为改进绩效度量、评估和审计(PMEA)功能所做的努力。这篇文章追溯了2000年以来的行政改革,强调了从投入和产出向注重结果、旨在取得成果的环境的转变。然而,即使在许多改革和善意之后,高层决策者对“结果对加拿大人的意义”仍然存在分歧。文章指出,按功能划分的孤立方法导致了在有效支持决策的数据共享和报告方面的孤立实践和效率低下。虽然个别职能有所改善,但实施全面的注重结果的管理架构仍然是一个重大挑战。本文提出了提高PMEA功能有效性的步骤,强调需要整合功能以加强公共服务、决策和机构学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada is the refereed scholarly publication of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). It covers executive, legislative, judicial and quasi-judicial functions at all three levels of Canadian government. Published quarterly, the journal focuses mainly on Canadian issues but also welcomes manuscripts which compare Canadian public sector institutions and practices with those in other countries or examine issues in other countries or international organizations which are of interest to the public administration community in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信