{"title":"An analysis of dental board disciplinary action among general dentists in Texas.","authors":"Yen-Wen Huang, Sahar Dowlatshahi, Srinivas Ayilavarapu, Jennifer Chang, Pooja Maney, Sridhar Eswaran","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental care professionals can gain valuable insights by examining infractions reported to the state board of dentistry, which can serve as a resource to enhance their professional practice. By reviewing various infractions (violations resulting in disciplinary action) reported by the state boards, dental care professionals can foster ethical awareness, uphold professional conduct, manage risks effectively, prioritize patient-centered care, engage in continuous professional development, and promote peer accountability. This study analyzes state dental board disciplinary action data in Texas to identify common infractions among practicing general dentists and to leverage this information as an educational tool for dental care professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search of disciplinary actions was conducted, using the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners database. For this study, 1,056 disciplinary action reports were reviewed, and disciplinary infractions were classified into 5 main categories based on the nature of the infractions related to diagnosis, treatment, renewals, recordkeeping, and ethics and professionalism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After reviewing 1,056 disciplinary actions, the results showed that most infractions were due to inadequate recordkeeping (39%). The rest of the infractions included inadequate treatment (23%), lack of ethics and professionalism (23%), improper diagnosis (9%), and renewal issues (6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dental disciplinary records offer valuable insights into common instances of misconduct within dental practices. It is essential to approach this information with a critical and reflective mindset, aiming to enhance clinical practice by learning from the common mistakes made by other clinicians.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Understanding the frequency and nature of infractions may promote a deeper awareness and sense of direction regarding where additional focus on ethics and practice management is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2024.12.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dental care professionals can gain valuable insights by examining infractions reported to the state board of dentistry, which can serve as a resource to enhance their professional practice. By reviewing various infractions (violations resulting in disciplinary action) reported by the state boards, dental care professionals can foster ethical awareness, uphold professional conduct, manage risks effectively, prioritize patient-centered care, engage in continuous professional development, and promote peer accountability. This study analyzes state dental board disciplinary action data in Texas to identify common infractions among practicing general dentists and to leverage this information as an educational tool for dental care professionals.
Methods: An electronic search of disciplinary actions was conducted, using the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners database. For this study, 1,056 disciplinary action reports were reviewed, and disciplinary infractions were classified into 5 main categories based on the nature of the infractions related to diagnosis, treatment, renewals, recordkeeping, and ethics and professionalism.
Results: After reviewing 1,056 disciplinary actions, the results showed that most infractions were due to inadequate recordkeeping (39%). The rest of the infractions included inadequate treatment (23%), lack of ethics and professionalism (23%), improper diagnosis (9%), and renewal issues (6%).
Conclusions: Dental disciplinary records offer valuable insights into common instances of misconduct within dental practices. It is essential to approach this information with a critical and reflective mindset, aiming to enhance clinical practice by learning from the common mistakes made by other clinicians.
Practical implications: Understanding the frequency and nature of infractions may promote a deeper awareness and sense of direction regarding where additional focus on ethics and practice management is needed.
期刊介绍：
There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
