The gestalt of customer centricity: Forces of resistance and research priorities

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Joel E. Urbany, Marta Dapena-Baron
{"title":"The gestalt of customer centricity: Forces of resistance and research priorities","authors":"Joel E. Urbany,&nbsp;Marta Dapena-Baron","doi":"10.1007/s13162-024-00289-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent research suggests a great deal of variance in how “customer centricity” is defined in the increasingly siloed scholarly literature and that many organizations continue to struggle in effectively implementing such initiatives. The interviews reported in Urbany and Dapena-Baron (2024) reveal the complexity of both (a) the many organizational context factors that need to be managed and adapted for a firm with a strong, established customer-centric practice to sustain and evolve it, and (b) the significant forces of resistance which face a firm that is early in its adoption of customer-centric practices. Here, we step back to consider the possibility that the pursuit of customer-centricity is often hindered by underestimation of the complexity, time, and resources required for effective transformation. We suggest that taking a more comprehensive view of customer centricity to consider its broader “Gestalt,” provides value in recognizing and planning for multiple component parts and for potential synergies between them. An overview of these components leads to a number of relevant research directions, centered around <b><i>two overarching priorities</i></b> through the change process: creating distinctive value for customers <b><i>to win demand</i></b> and creating distinctive value for employees <b><i>to win their buy-in</i></b>. We overview the components of customer centricity and present a set of research priorities with the goal of building a greater understanding of the individual component parts and the potential synergies between them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"14 3-4","pages":"308 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-024-00289-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research suggests a great deal of variance in how “customer centricity” is defined in the increasingly siloed scholarly literature and that many organizations continue to struggle in effectively implementing such initiatives. The interviews reported in Urbany and Dapena-Baron (2024) reveal the complexity of both (a) the many organizational context factors that need to be managed and adapted for a firm with a strong, established customer-centric practice to sustain and evolve it, and (b) the significant forces of resistance which face a firm that is early in its adoption of customer-centric practices. Here, we step back to consider the possibility that the pursuit of customer-centricity is often hindered by underestimation of the complexity, time, and resources required for effective transformation. We suggest that taking a more comprehensive view of customer centricity to consider its broader “Gestalt,” provides value in recognizing and planning for multiple component parts and for potential synergies between them. An overview of these components leads to a number of relevant research directions, centered around two overarching priorities through the change process: creating distinctive value for customers to win demand and creating distinctive value for employees to win their buy-in. We overview the components of customer centricity and present a set of research priorities with the goal of building a greater understanding of the individual component parts and the potential synergies between them.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMS Review
AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication.  The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信