Maintaining legitimacy through the integration of discursive and visual strategies: A multimodal study of incumbents’ clean energy facilities in China

IF 5.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lingchuan Song , Yan Sun , Xiaofei Gao
{"title":"Maintaining legitimacy through the integration of discursive and visual strategies: A multimodal study of incumbents’ clean energy facilities in China","authors":"Lingchuan Song ,&nbsp;Yan Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While clean energy facilities (CEFs) play a crucial role in advancing the energy transition and in achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, incumbents in the clean energy market often face public concerns stemming from wrongdoing and accidents within the industry, prompting them to engage in legitimacy maintenance for their CEFs. We know little about the specific strategies incumbents employ for this purpose. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study focusing on the State Power Investment Corporation Limited (SPIC) in China. Our findings extend existing research on organizational legitimacy by revealing five discursive and three visual strategies of legitimation. We further highlight two specific forms of intermodal associations between discursive and visual modes: concurrence and complementarity. Moreover, our study contributes to the energy transition literature by explaining how these discursive and visual strategies benefit incumbents in the clean energy market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 100961"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424001515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While clean energy facilities (CEFs) play a crucial role in advancing the energy transition and in achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, incumbents in the clean energy market often face public concerns stemming from wrongdoing and accidents within the industry, prompting them to engage in legitimacy maintenance for their CEFs. We know little about the specific strategies incumbents employ for this purpose. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study focusing on the State Power Investment Corporation Limited (SPIC) in China. Our findings extend existing research on organizational legitimacy by revealing five discursive and three visual strategies of legitimation. We further highlight two specific forms of intermodal associations between discursive and visual modes: concurrence and complementarity. Moreover, our study contributes to the energy transition literature by explaining how these discursive and visual strategies benefit incumbents in the clean energy market.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信