Tokenism in gender diversity on board of directors

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Kan Nakajima , Yoko Shirasu , Eiji Kodera
{"title":"Tokenism in gender diversity on board of directors","authors":"Kan Nakajima ,&nbsp;Yoko Shirasu ,&nbsp;Eiji Kodera","doi":"10.1016/j.jjie.2024.101342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the existence of tokenism in Japanese companies following the implementation of corporate governance reforms. We focus on the appointment of female outside directors. The existence of tokenism on corporate boards is an important issue for companies worldwide because it deals with gender diversity in the appointment of board members. Following the Abenomics policy of empowering females, Japan introduced “Japan's Corporate Governance Code” (the Code), which included board reforms such as appointing at least two outside directors. Using our sample period after the introduction of the Code, we examine whether tokenism occurs in Japan, a country with low female participation in business. The empirical analysis reveals the occurrence of tokenism at the start of the Code's introduction. Companies appoint two outside directors to meet the formal requirements of the Code. They appoint a male outside director first and a female director later as a token. However, tokenism is not observed when busy female directors with extensive experience are appointed to the board, presumably because they have expertise and skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Japanese and International Economies","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Japanese and International Economies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889158324000388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the existence of tokenism in Japanese companies following the implementation of corporate governance reforms. We focus on the appointment of female outside directors. The existence of tokenism on corporate boards is an important issue for companies worldwide because it deals with gender diversity in the appointment of board members. Following the Abenomics policy of empowering females, Japan introduced “Japan's Corporate Governance Code” (the Code), which included board reforms such as appointing at least two outside directors. Using our sample period after the introduction of the Code, we examine whether tokenism occurs in Japan, a country with low female participation in business. The empirical analysis reveals the occurrence of tokenism at the start of the Code's introduction. Companies appoint two outside directors to meet the formal requirements of the Code. They appoint a male outside director first and a female director later as a token. However, tokenism is not observed when busy female directors with extensive experience are appointed to the board, presumably because they have expertise and skills.
董事会性别多样性的象征主义
本研究检视日本企业在公司治理改革后是否存在象征主义。我们专注于女性外部董事的任命。公司董事会中象征性行为的存在对世界各地的公司来说都是一个重要问题,因为它涉及董事会成员任命中的性别多样性。继赋予女性权力的安倍经济学政策之后,日本推出了“日本公司治理守则”(以下简称“守则”),其中包括任命至少两名外部董事等董事会改革。我们利用《行为准则》出台后的样本期,考察了日本这个女性商业参与率较低的国家是否出现了象征性行为。实证分析表明,在《法典》引入之初,就出现了象征主义。公司委任两名外部董事,以符合守则的正式要求。他们先任命一名男性外部董事,然后再任命一名女性董事。然而,当拥有丰富经验的忙碌女性董事被任命为董事会成员时,可能是因为她们有专业知识和技能,因此不会出现象征性的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Japanese and International Economies publishes original reports of research devoted to academic analyses of the Japanese economy and its interdependence on other national economies. The Journal also features articles that present related theoretical, empirical, and comparative analyses with their policy implications. Book reviews are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信