Clean energy innovation, corporate carbon footprint and profits: Win-win strategic options

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Francisco Porles-Ochoa, Ruben Guevara
{"title":"Clean energy innovation, corporate carbon footprint and profits: Win-win strategic options","authors":"Francisco Porles-Ochoa,&nbsp;Ruben Guevara","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread use of fossil fuels in production processes, along with a heavy dependency on carbon-based materials in firms that emit substantial amounts of carbon dioxide equivalent, poses a global threat to both environmental and economic sustainability. A better understanding is needed regarding the relevance of clean energy innovation and its direct and indirect impact on lowering carbon footprints in the existing body of research. This study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for a systematic review, followed by an in-depth evaluation of findings. The review examined 153 scholarly articles published between 2018 and 2023, aiming to assess the evolutionary nuances of clean energy innovation in the context of global decarbonisation. Results indicate that 58.5 % of evaluated hypotheses demonstrate a positive association between corporate environmental and financial performance, whilst 31.4 % show a negative impact on profitability. The remaining 10.1 % yield mixed findings. Notably, there is a paucity of research on the potential moderating or mediating effects of clean energy innovation on this relationship. This study contributes to the scientific corpus by identifying two understudied research areas. Firstly, Scope 3 emissions have a substantial and positive effect on the major corporations' overall financial performance. Secondly, further research is warranted to determine how clean energy innovation can moderate or mediate the relationship between eco-innovation strategies and company performance. This research is vital for understanding clean energy innovation's potential as a pathway toward decarbonisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115255"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400981X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of fossil fuels in production processes, along with a heavy dependency on carbon-based materials in firms that emit substantial amounts of carbon dioxide equivalent, poses a global threat to both environmental and economic sustainability. A better understanding is needed regarding the relevance of clean energy innovation and its direct and indirect impact on lowering carbon footprints in the existing body of research. This study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for a systematic review, followed by an in-depth evaluation of findings. The review examined 153 scholarly articles published between 2018 and 2023, aiming to assess the evolutionary nuances of clean energy innovation in the context of global decarbonisation. Results indicate that 58.5 % of evaluated hypotheses demonstrate a positive association between corporate environmental and financial performance, whilst 31.4 % show a negative impact on profitability. The remaining 10.1 % yield mixed findings. Notably, there is a paucity of research on the potential moderating or mediating effects of clean energy innovation on this relationship. This study contributes to the scientific corpus by identifying two understudied research areas. Firstly, Scope 3 emissions have a substantial and positive effect on the major corporations' overall financial performance. Secondly, further research is warranted to determine how clean energy innovation can moderate or mediate the relationship between eco-innovation strategies and company performance. This research is vital for understanding clean energy innovation's potential as a pathway toward decarbonisation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信