The multidimensional influences of environmental factors on carbon storage: Evidence from Zagros Forests of Iran

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Maziar Haidari , Yaghoub Iranmanesh , Abolfazl Jaafari , Mehdi Pourhashemi , Jalal Henarah , Farhad Jahanpour , Arash Derikvandi , Behrouz Fani
{"title":"The multidimensional influences of environmental factors on carbon storage: Evidence from Zagros Forests of Iran","authors":"Maziar Haidari ,&nbsp;Yaghoub Iranmanesh ,&nbsp;Abolfazl Jaafari ,&nbsp;Mehdi Pourhashemi ,&nbsp;Jalal Henarah ,&nbsp;Farhad Jahanpour ,&nbsp;Arash Derikvandi ,&nbsp;Behrouz Fani","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective carbon storage in forests is crucial for mitigating climate change by capturing and holding carbon dioxide, aligning with the broader goals of ecosystem restoration and carbon neutrality central to Nature-based Solutions (NbS). Different forests have varying carbon storage capacities based on their unique characteristics and a range of multidimensional influences from environmental factors, necessitating region-specific management strategies. In this study, we explored the multidimensional influences on carbon storage among forests distributed across three provinces in the Zagros Forests of Iran: West Azerbaijan, Kurdistan, and Lorestan. Data from 10 monitoring sites revealed significant variations in carbon storage between above-ground and below-ground components across the provinces. West Azerbaijan exhibited the highest overall carbon storage, while Lorestan and Kurdistan showed distinct patterns in specific carbon storage components. Organic carbon, total nitrogen, relative humidity, and precipitation emerged as the strongest positive influencers of carbon storage, whereas factors such as gravel content, temperature, and evaporation had negative impacts. Overall, our results suggested that the carbon storage capacity of a region is closely tied to the characteristics of a province, which is a critical consideration for NbS. Interestingly, provinces with higher density and larger trees were found to have superior carbon storage, underscoring the importance of targeted conservation efforts. These results align with the principles of NbS by highlighting the need for region-specific forest management and carbon sequestration strategies to maximize carbon storage and support ecosystem restoration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107523"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective carbon storage in forests is crucial for mitigating climate change by capturing and holding carbon dioxide, aligning with the broader goals of ecosystem restoration and carbon neutrality central to Nature-based Solutions (NbS). Different forests have varying carbon storage capacities based on their unique characteristics and a range of multidimensional influences from environmental factors, necessitating region-specific management strategies. In this study, we explored the multidimensional influences on carbon storage among forests distributed across three provinces in the Zagros Forests of Iran: West Azerbaijan, Kurdistan, and Lorestan. Data from 10 monitoring sites revealed significant variations in carbon storage between above-ground and below-ground components across the provinces. West Azerbaijan exhibited the highest overall carbon storage, while Lorestan and Kurdistan showed distinct patterns in specific carbon storage components. Organic carbon, total nitrogen, relative humidity, and precipitation emerged as the strongest positive influencers of carbon storage, whereas factors such as gravel content, temperature, and evaporation had negative impacts. Overall, our results suggested that the carbon storage capacity of a region is closely tied to the characteristics of a province, which is a critical consideration for NbS. Interestingly, provinces with higher density and larger trees were found to have superior carbon storage, underscoring the importance of targeted conservation efforts. These results align with the principles of NbS by highlighting the need for region-specific forest management and carbon sequestration strategies to maximize carbon storage and support ecosystem restoration.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信