How does idea rejection translate into employee creativity: A perspective from incubation theory

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Weimin Hu, Bin He, Xu Sun, Hao Jian
{"title":"How does idea rejection translate into employee creativity: A perspective from incubation theory","authors":"Weimin Hu,&nbsp;Bin He,&nbsp;Xu Sun,&nbsp;Hao Jian","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have generally posited that idea rejection negatively impacts innovation performance, however, few have explored the potential positive effects. From a novel perspective grounded in incubation theory, this research investigated whether, how, and when idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. Six studies were conducted: a questionnaire survey (Study 1a) and five simulated situational experiments (Studies 1b, 1c, 1d, 2, and 3). In Study 1a, we collected samples from various industry backgrounds, including manufacturing, high-tech companies, internet-related companies, and modern service industries, to verify whether idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. Studies 1b, 1c, and 1d further validated the findings of Study 1a in distinct fields—new home and kitchen products, technology, and scientific research—through simulated situational experiments. Studies 2 and 3 selected new home and kitchen products as representative experimental situations and used simulated situational experiments to explore the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which idea rejection translates into employee creativity. The results revealed that idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. This translation was mediated by both problem restructuring and the activation of new knowledge. Furthermore, servant leadership positively moderated the relationship between idea rejection and the activation of new knowledge, thereby strengthening the mediating role of the latter. However, servant leadership did not moderate the relationship between idea rejection and problem restructuring, nor did it enhance the mediating role of problem restructuring. These findings opened the “black box” of how idea rejection is translated into employee creativity, expanded the research on the effects of idea rejection, and provided a reference for organizational innovation management practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 103146"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001962","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have generally posited that idea rejection negatively impacts innovation performance, however, few have explored the potential positive effects. From a novel perspective grounded in incubation theory, this research investigated whether, how, and when idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. Six studies were conducted: a questionnaire survey (Study 1a) and five simulated situational experiments (Studies 1b, 1c, 1d, 2, and 3). In Study 1a, we collected samples from various industry backgrounds, including manufacturing, high-tech companies, internet-related companies, and modern service industries, to verify whether idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. Studies 1b, 1c, and 1d further validated the findings of Study 1a in distinct fields—new home and kitchen products, technology, and scientific research—through simulated situational experiments. Studies 2 and 3 selected new home and kitchen products as representative experimental situations and used simulated situational experiments to explore the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which idea rejection translates into employee creativity. The results revealed that idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. This translation was mediated by both problem restructuring and the activation of new knowledge. Furthermore, servant leadership positively moderated the relationship between idea rejection and the activation of new knowledge, thereby strengthening the mediating role of the latter. However, servant leadership did not moderate the relationship between idea rejection and problem restructuring, nor did it enhance the mediating role of problem restructuring. These findings opened the “black box” of how idea rejection is translated into employee creativity, expanded the research on the effects of idea rejection, and provided a reference for organizational innovation management practices.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信