An empirical exploration of the unintended effects of circular economy policies in the European Union: The case of textiles

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Martyna Solis , Leonidas Milios , Davide Tonini , Steffen Foss Hansen , Charlotte Scheutz , Dries Huygens
{"title":"An empirical exploration of the unintended effects of circular economy policies in the European Union: The case of textiles","authors":"Martyna Solis ,&nbsp;Leonidas Milios ,&nbsp;Davide Tonini ,&nbsp;Steffen Foss Hansen ,&nbsp;Charlotte Scheutz ,&nbsp;Dries Huygens","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the need for further research on methods to estimate unintended effects, specifically in the context of circular economy, and the European Union's textile policy in the making, it is necessary to understand and account for any potential unintended effects ex-ante. This study explores the unintended effects of past and hypothetical future textile policies in order to categorise them empirically and to evaluate scientific tools for improving ex-ante impact assessments. The study combines interviews with policy development experts, a stakeholder survey and a thematic analysis of the findings, which confirm that an evident gap exists between the acknowledged importance of unintended effects and the tools used to address them. Second-order effects, defined as indirect and unintended effects prompted by changes in a socio-technical system (e.g., policy implementation and its direct effects) prove to be as equally relevant as first-order effects or direct effects. The categorisation of these effects showed that most of them were related to alterations to legal requirements influencing import-export and value chain dynamics, the exploitation of loopholes in legislation and fraud, as well as price alterations affecting household consumption patterns and business strategies. The experts' suggestions for addressing better the unintended effects of policies in ex-ante impact assessments confirm the importance of reinforcing or expanding the use of scientific tools during policy processes, i.e. stakeholder engagement, combined micro- and macro-economic modelling, extended consideration of the European Union's resilience and the inclusion of a behavioural and social component. It was highlighted that unintended effects are not always negative, and even when so, they do not necessarily have to discredit a policy altogether. This study contributes to informed decision-making on future circular economy policy in the European Union.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"54 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the need for further research on methods to estimate unintended effects, specifically in the context of circular economy, and the European Union's textile policy in the making, it is necessary to understand and account for any potential unintended effects ex-ante. This study explores the unintended effects of past and hypothetical future textile policies in order to categorise them empirically and to evaluate scientific tools for improving ex-ante impact assessments. The study combines interviews with policy development experts, a stakeholder survey and a thematic analysis of the findings, which confirm that an evident gap exists between the acknowledged importance of unintended effects and the tools used to address them. Second-order effects, defined as indirect and unintended effects prompted by changes in a socio-technical system (e.g., policy implementation and its direct effects) prove to be as equally relevant as first-order effects or direct effects. The categorisation of these effects showed that most of them were related to alterations to legal requirements influencing import-export and value chain dynamics, the exploitation of loopholes in legislation and fraud, as well as price alterations affecting household consumption patterns and business strategies. The experts' suggestions for addressing better the unintended effects of policies in ex-ante impact assessments confirm the importance of reinforcing or expanding the use of scientific tools during policy processes, i.e. stakeholder engagement, combined micro- and macro-economic modelling, extended consideration of the European Union's resilience and the inclusion of a behavioural and social component. It was highlighted that unintended effects are not always negative, and even when so, they do not necessarily have to discredit a policy altogether. This study contributes to informed decision-making on future circular economy policy in the European Union.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信