Extraction solvents and geographical origins of Piper retrofractum on the control efficiency of Spodoptera litura and Spodoptera frugiperda in laboratory and greenhouse conditions

Nattarat Tipsut , Nutchaya Kumrungsee , Lalita Pimsawang , Veeravat Changkeb , Wanchai Pluempanupat , Tanapon Chaisan , Vasakorn Bullangpoti
{"title":"Extraction solvents and geographical origins of Piper retrofractum on the control efficiency of Spodoptera litura and Spodoptera frugiperda in laboratory and greenhouse conditions","authors":"Nattarat Tipsut ,&nbsp;Nutchaya Kumrungsee ,&nbsp;Lalita Pimsawang ,&nbsp;Veeravat Changkeb ,&nbsp;Wanchai Pluempanupat ,&nbsp;Tanapon Chaisan ,&nbsp;Vasakorn Bullangpoti","doi":"10.1016/j.napere.2025.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Typically, the active ingredients of plant extracts vary depending on the cultivation region and the solvent polarity. This research aimed to compare the control efficiency of the topical application of <em>Piper retrofractum</em> extracts from seventeen cultivar areas using two solvents, ethanol, and hexane on <em>Spodoptera frugiperda</em> and <em>Spodoptera litura</em>. Our study revealed that the hexane crude extract had the highest toxicity on both species (LC50 ∼ 2516 and 4325 ppm for <em>S. frugiperda</em> and <em>S. litura</em>, respectively). In addition, <em>P. retrofractum</em> from the northeastern area, especially from Bueng Kan Province, had the highest toxicity to <em>S. frugiperda</em> and <em>S. litura</em> (LD50∼38.38 and 58.38 ppm, respectively). The extract from this province also showed toxicity to both species, which was not different from that of synthetic pesticides in the greenhouse. The control efficiency of <em>P. retrofractum</em> extracts on <em>S. frugiperda</em> and <em>S. litura</em> depended on their cultivar areas and solvent polarity. These results will be useful as information for developing this plant as a botanical pesticide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078625000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Typically, the active ingredients of plant extracts vary depending on the cultivation region and the solvent polarity. This research aimed to compare the control efficiency of the topical application of Piper retrofractum extracts from seventeen cultivar areas using two solvents, ethanol, and hexane on Spodoptera frugiperda and Spodoptera litura. Our study revealed that the hexane crude extract had the highest toxicity on both species (LC50 ∼ 2516 and 4325 ppm for S. frugiperda and S. litura, respectively). In addition, P. retrofractum from the northeastern area, especially from Bueng Kan Province, had the highest toxicity to S. frugiperda and S. litura (LD50∼38.38 and 58.38 ppm, respectively). The extract from this province also showed toxicity to both species, which was not different from that of synthetic pesticides in the greenhouse. The control efficiency of P. retrofractum extracts on S. frugiperda and S. litura depended on their cultivar areas and solvent polarity. These results will be useful as information for developing this plant as a botanical pesticide.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信