Do individuals interpret sexting as an indicator of sexual intent and sexual consent?

IF 9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108530

Rylie Yager , Michelle Drouin , Tara L. Cornelius

{"title":"Do individuals interpret sexting as an indicator of sexual intent and sexual consent?","authors":"Rylie Yager , Michelle Drouin , Tara L. Cornelius","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Miscommunications caused by ambiguous consent practices increase the risk of sexual assault. However, minimal research has investigated the interpretation of sexually ambiguous behaviors that occur through electronic communication. This study fills a gap in sexual communication literature by examining perceptions of sexting as a means of communicating sexual intent and sexual consent. The study also examined the effects of gender and sexual precedence on perceptions of sexual intent and consent, in light of their influence on sexual communication. Using a factorial vignette design, 1483 U.S. college students were randomly assigned to one of four scenarios regarding a sexual encounter between two heterosexual individuals with suggestive texting/sexting and/or sexual precedence (i.e., previous sexual involvement), followed by measures that assessed perceptions of sexual intent and consent. Sexting was commonly conceptualized as a form of communicating sexual intent and consent. Male-identifying participants perceived a higher likelihood of sexual consent being exchanged through sexts than female-identifying participants. Sexual precedence increased perceived sexual intent and sexual consent ratings. Results suggest that while sexting was mutually viewed as a signal of sexual intent, there are gender differences in perceptions of sexual consent. Further, the influence of sexual precedence on sexual communication was present via electronic communication. These results offer important implications for sexual assault prevention programs that are situated within modern, technology-mediated means of sexual communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108530"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224003984","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Miscommunications caused by ambiguous consent practices increase the risk of sexual assault. However, minimal research has investigated the interpretation of sexually ambiguous behaviors that occur through electronic communication. This study fills a gap in sexual communication literature by examining perceptions of sexting as a means of communicating sexual intent and sexual consent. The study also examined the effects of gender and sexual precedence on perceptions of sexual intent and consent, in light of their influence on sexual communication. Using a factorial vignette design, 1483 U.S. college students were randomly assigned to one of four scenarios regarding a sexual encounter between two heterosexual individuals with suggestive texting/sexting and/or sexual precedence (i.e., previous sexual involvement), followed by measures that assessed perceptions of sexual intent and consent. Sexting was commonly conceptualized as a form of communicating sexual intent and consent. Male-identifying participants perceived a higher likelihood of sexual consent being exchanged through sexts than female-identifying participants. Sexual precedence increased perceived sexual intent and sexual consent ratings. Results suggest that while sexting was mutually viewed as a signal of sexual intent, there are gender differences in perceptions of sexual consent. Further, the influence of sexual precedence on sexual communication was present via electronic communication. These results offer important implications for sexual assault prevention programs that are situated within modern, technology-mediated means of sexual communication.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Computers in Human Behavior Multiple-

CiteScore

19.10

自引率

4.00%

发文量

381

审稿时长

40 days

期刊介绍： Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.