Energy efficiency and emission flexibility: Management and economic insights for renewable energy integration

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Abid Hussain , Alida Huseynova , Yegana Hakimova , Abdelmohsen A. Nassani , Bai Bo
{"title":"Energy efficiency and emission flexibility: Management and economic insights for renewable energy integration","authors":"Abid Hussain ,&nbsp;Alida Huseynova ,&nbsp;Yegana Hakimova ,&nbsp;Abdelmohsen A. Nassani ,&nbsp;Bai Bo","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study suggests a multi-regional power system optimization model to evaluate the impact of various flexibility options on reducing carbon emissions in the Chinese power sector. This model considers factors such as total carbon emissions, peaking timetables and values, carbon emission transfer between regional power systems, and changes in carbon emission sources between technologies. The findings reveal four primary outcomes: first, renewable energy integration significantly improves energy efficiency across all G7 nations, although the degree of impact varies among them. Second, emission flexibility mechanisms, such as carbon trading and adaptable regulatory policies, have positively influenced emission reductions without compromising economic growth. Third, the interaction between energy efficiency and renewable energy use is shown to be mutually reinforcing, particularly in the countries with high levels of technological innovation. Fourth, energy policy frameworks that adapt to fluctuating grid demands and environmental targets have a measurable effect on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The results suggest that policy efforts should focus on enhancing adaptive regulatory frameworks and investment in renewable technologies, which are crucial for achieving long-term emission reduction goals while maintaining economic resilience in the G7.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101631"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24003407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study suggests a multi-regional power system optimization model to evaluate the impact of various flexibility options on reducing carbon emissions in the Chinese power sector. This model considers factors such as total carbon emissions, peaking timetables and values, carbon emission transfer between regional power systems, and changes in carbon emission sources between technologies. The findings reveal four primary outcomes: first, renewable energy integration significantly improves energy efficiency across all G7 nations, although the degree of impact varies among them. Second, emission flexibility mechanisms, such as carbon trading and adaptable regulatory policies, have positively influenced emission reductions without compromising economic growth. Third, the interaction between energy efficiency and renewable energy use is shown to be mutually reinforcing, particularly in the countries with high levels of technological innovation. Fourth, energy policy frameworks that adapt to fluctuating grid demands and environmental targets have a measurable effect on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The results suggest that policy efforts should focus on enhancing adaptive regulatory frameworks and investment in renewable technologies, which are crucial for achieving long-term emission reduction goals while maintaining economic resilience in the G7.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信