China's provincial net-zero emissions effort: High-quality choices behind up-bottom quota schemes

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Haoran Wang , Tiantian Feng , Jiajie Kong , Mingli Cui , Daoshun Zha
{"title":"China's provincial net-zero emissions effort: High-quality choices behind up-bottom quota schemes","authors":"Haoran Wang ,&nbsp;Tiantian Feng ,&nbsp;Jiajie Kong ,&nbsp;Mingli Cui ,&nbsp;Daoshun Zha","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon emission rights are the spotlight for countries around the world in terms of how to allocate these under net-zero targets. This study proposes five allocation principles based on the carbon emission rights allocation mechanism, including equality, responsibility, capacity, efficiency, and time phases. Seventeen interprovincial emission allocation schemes are studied under China's net-zero emissions path, and then the best allocation scheme is selected using the PROMETHEE II and the linkage relationship among provincial quotas is clarifies using the PROMETHEE I. The results show that (1) the quota schemes that considers of equality, responsibility, capacity, efficiency and phasing principles to fully interprets “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities”. (2) Southeastern coastal areas such as Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shanghai are assigned more quotas, whereas northeastern and western regions such as Heilongjiang and Jilin are allocated fewer quotas in the optimal scheme. (3) The government needs to dynamically adjust quota allocation principles on the basis of national emission reduction strategy goals and low-carbon policies. These results can provide China's provincial carbon emission share in reaching net zero to help formulate a provincial carbon action blueprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 108118"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924007080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon emission rights are the spotlight for countries around the world in terms of how to allocate these under net-zero targets. This study proposes five allocation principles based on the carbon emission rights allocation mechanism, including equality, responsibility, capacity, efficiency, and time phases. Seventeen interprovincial emission allocation schemes are studied under China's net-zero emissions path, and then the best allocation scheme is selected using the PROMETHEE II and the linkage relationship among provincial quotas is clarifies using the PROMETHEE I. The results show that (1) the quota schemes that considers of equality, responsibility, capacity, efficiency and phasing principles to fully interprets “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities”. (2) Southeastern coastal areas such as Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shanghai are assigned more quotas, whereas northeastern and western regions such as Heilongjiang and Jilin are allocated fewer quotas in the optimal scheme. (3) The government needs to dynamically adjust quota allocation principles on the basis of national emission reduction strategy goals and low-carbon policies. These results can provide China's provincial carbon emission share in reaching net zero to help formulate a provincial carbon action blueprint.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信