A reflection of learners’ motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being in extensive and intensive reading offline instruction: A focus on self-determination theory

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Youhong Lin
{"title":"A reflection of learners’ motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being in extensive and intensive reading offline instruction: A focus on self-determination theory","authors":"Youhong Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, different researchers have been paying increasing attention to self-determination theory (henceforth, SDT). This study explores the impact of extensive and intensive reading instruction on learners' motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being through the lens of SDT. Conducted at a large university in China, the research involved 126 participants, equally distributed by gender and aged between 18 and 29, who were enrolled in a General English Course. The participants were divided into three groups: two experimental groups and a control group. The first experimental group received offline extensive reading instruction, while the second experimental group received offline intensive reading instruction. The control group, on the other hand, received traditional teacher-fronted instruction with minimal emphasis on reading. Data collection involved narrative frames and semi-structured interviews, with a thematic analysis revealing significant differences in outcomes between the groups. The first experimental group showed notable improvements in their motivation to read, self-assessment abilities, and critical thinking skills. The second experimental group demonstrated enhanced critical thinking skills and academic well-being. In contrast, the control group exhibited no significant improvements across the studied dimensions. These findings certify the transformative potential of alternative reading instructional approaches in fostering critical educational outcomes. By situating these results within the framework of SDT, the study highlights the importance of supporting learners’ intrinsic motivation through tailored instructional strategies. These insights hold practical implications for educators, advocating for the adoption of extensive and intensive reading instruction to enhance learners’ academic and cognitive development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102093"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024001358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, different researchers have been paying increasing attention to self-determination theory (henceforth, SDT). This study explores the impact of extensive and intensive reading instruction on learners' motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being through the lens of SDT. Conducted at a large university in China, the research involved 126 participants, equally distributed by gender and aged between 18 and 29, who were enrolled in a General English Course. The participants were divided into three groups: two experimental groups and a control group. The first experimental group received offline extensive reading instruction, while the second experimental group received offline intensive reading instruction. The control group, on the other hand, received traditional teacher-fronted instruction with minimal emphasis on reading. Data collection involved narrative frames and semi-structured interviews, with a thematic analysis revealing significant differences in outcomes between the groups. The first experimental group showed notable improvements in their motivation to read, self-assessment abilities, and critical thinking skills. The second experimental group demonstrated enhanced critical thinking skills and academic well-being. In contrast, the control group exhibited no significant improvements across the studied dimensions. These findings certify the transformative potential of alternative reading instructional approaches in fostering critical educational outcomes. By situating these results within the framework of SDT, the study highlights the importance of supporting learners’ intrinsic motivation through tailored instructional strategies. These insights hold practical implications for educators, advocating for the adoption of extensive and intensive reading instruction to enhance learners’ academic and cognitive development.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信