Evaluating the role of protection motivation theory in information security policy compliance: Insights from the banking sector using PLS-SEM approach

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Ebrahim Mohammed Alrawhani , Awanis Romli , Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi
{"title":"Evaluating the role of protection motivation theory in information security policy compliance: Insights from the banking sector using PLS-SEM approach","authors":"Ebrahim Mohammed Alrawhani ,&nbsp;Awanis Romli ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigated the behavior related to compliance with information security policy in the Yemeni banking sector by using the protection motivation theory (PMT). While PMT has been a prominent framework in understanding information security compliance, previous research has produced inconsistent findings regarding its factors' effects on compliance behavior, necessitating further empirical validation. Moreover, the majority of research has been carried out in developed countries. The data were collected from 210 bank employees in Yemen and analyzed using PLS-SEM. This research study showed that perceived self-efficacy, response efficacy, and severity significantly influence the employees' intentional behavior in complying with information security policies. However, the results did not support the hypotheses of perceived response cost and perceived vulnerability. The study also discusses both theoretical and practical implications of enhancing information security compliance behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 1","pages":"Article 100463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124002579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigated the behavior related to compliance with information security policy in the Yemeni banking sector by using the protection motivation theory (PMT). While PMT has been a prominent framework in understanding information security compliance, previous research has produced inconsistent findings regarding its factors' effects on compliance behavior, necessitating further empirical validation. Moreover, the majority of research has been carried out in developed countries. The data were collected from 210 bank employees in Yemen and analyzed using PLS-SEM. This research study showed that perceived self-efficacy, response efficacy, and severity significantly influence the employees' intentional behavior in complying with information security policies. However, the results did not support the hypotheses of perceived response cost and perceived vulnerability. The study also discusses both theoretical and practical implications of enhancing information security compliance behavior.
评估保护动机理论在信息安全策略合规性中的作用:使用PLS-SEM方法的银行业见解
本研究利用保护动机理论(PMT)调查了也门银行业遵守信息安全政策的相关行为。虽然PMT是理解信息安全合规性的重要框架,但以往的研究对其因素对合规性行为的影响结果并不一致,需要进一步的实证验证。此外,大多数研究都是在发达国家进行的。数据收集自也门的210名银行员工,并使用PLS-SEM进行分析。本研究发现,感知自我效能感、反应效能感和严重程度显著影响员工遵守信息安全政策的故意行为。然而,研究结果并不支持感知反应成本和感知脆弱性的假设。本文还讨论了加强信息安全合规行为的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信