Promoting ecological sustainability in the arid farming-pastoral ecotone through optimal water allocation

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jiachen Ji , Tianqi Zhao , Zihan Wu , Fan Zhang , Jing Yan , Naijing Lu
{"title":"Promoting ecological sustainability in the arid farming-pastoral ecotone through optimal water allocation","authors":"Jiachen Ji ,&nbsp;Tianqi Zhao ,&nbsp;Zihan Wu ,&nbsp;Fan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jing Yan ,&nbsp;Naijing Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ecological fragility of arid farming-pastoral ecotones is pronounced, and the promotion of regional ecological sustainability under the constraints of limited resources has become a crucial issue for these zones. This study presents a novel framework for evaluating ecological sustainability, quantifying its relationship with ecological water consumption, and optimizing water resources allocation for improving ecological sustainability. A fuzzy credibility-constrained stochastic multi-objective programming (FCCSMOP) model is applied to optimize regional water allocation schemes. The proposed approach has advantages in: (1) quantifying the water-driven dynamics of ecological sustainability at the county scale; (2) balancing economic, ecological, and social benefits; and (3) addressing randomness and fuzziness caused by hydrological variability and water managers’ preferences. This approach was applied to the northern foot of Yinshan Mountain (NFYM), Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, leading to the following findings: (1) ecological sustainability in NFYM is poor, with 70.31% of the region having an ecological sustainability score below 0.43 in 2019; (2) there is a positive relationship between ecological sustainability and water consumption with the relatively high correlation (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> ∈ [0.39, 0.87]); (3) the FCCSMOP model can effectively address the multiple conflicting objectives, randomness, and fuzziness when generating optimal water allocation schemes. A comparison between the optimization results (normal year, <em>β</em>=0.75) and the status quo shows improvements of 5.60%, 19.45%, and 6.35% in ecological sustainability, water use efficiency, and the index of water use structure balance, respectively. The models and methods can also be applied to similar regions suffering water and ecological crisis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"652 ","pages":"Article 132609"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424020055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ecological fragility of arid farming-pastoral ecotones is pronounced, and the promotion of regional ecological sustainability under the constraints of limited resources has become a crucial issue for these zones. This study presents a novel framework for evaluating ecological sustainability, quantifying its relationship with ecological water consumption, and optimizing water resources allocation for improving ecological sustainability. A fuzzy credibility-constrained stochastic multi-objective programming (FCCSMOP) model is applied to optimize regional water allocation schemes. The proposed approach has advantages in: (1) quantifying the water-driven dynamics of ecological sustainability at the county scale; (2) balancing economic, ecological, and social benefits; and (3) addressing randomness and fuzziness caused by hydrological variability and water managers’ preferences. This approach was applied to the northern foot of Yinshan Mountain (NFYM), Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, leading to the following findings: (1) ecological sustainability in NFYM is poor, with 70.31% of the region having an ecological sustainability score below 0.43 in 2019; (2) there is a positive relationship between ecological sustainability and water consumption with the relatively high correlation (R2 ∈ [0.39, 0.87]); (3) the FCCSMOP model can effectively address the multiple conflicting objectives, randomness, and fuzziness when generating optimal water allocation schemes. A comparison between the optimization results (normal year, β=0.75) and the status quo shows improvements of 5.60%, 19.45%, and 6.35% in ecological sustainability, water use efficiency, and the index of water use structure balance, respectively. The models and methods can also be applied to similar regions suffering water and ecological crisis.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信