Resultados a corto plazo de la puesta a plano, curetaje y marsupialización frente a la técnica de Karydakis en el tratamiento del seno pilonidal. Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Pedro Antonio Parra Baños , Nuria Martínez Sanz , Francisco Miguel González Valverde , Jorge Alejandro Benavides Buleje , Miguel Ruiz Marín , Emilio Peña Ros , Carmen Martínez Sanz , Mari Fe Candel Arenas
{"title":"Resultados a corto plazo de la puesta a plano, curetaje y marsupialización frente a la técnica de Karydakis en el tratamiento del seno pilonidal. Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado","authors":"Pedro Antonio Parra Baños ,&nbsp;Nuria Martínez Sanz ,&nbsp;Francisco Miguel González Valverde ,&nbsp;Jorge Alejandro Benavides Buleje ,&nbsp;Miguel Ruiz Marín ,&nbsp;Emilio Peña Ros ,&nbsp;Carmen Martínez Sanz ,&nbsp;Mari Fe Candel Arenas","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The treatment of pilonidal sinus (PS) is usually surgical, but no procedure is considered the <em>gold standard</em>. The Karydakis (K) technique is widely used, and unroofing and marsupialization (UM) is a simple surgery with good results.</div></div><div><h3>Primary objective</h3><div>To evaluate early postoperative complications (EPC) 30 days after UM surgery compared to the K technique.</div></div><div><h3>Secondary objectives</h3><div>To evaluate surgical time, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, return to daily activity and early recurrence within 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Prospective, single-center, randomized study in patients who underwent surgery for primary PS with no abscess between June 2016 and November 2017. They were randomized using a computer-generated block method. To analyze the main objective, a non-inferiority analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred twenty-two patients with symptomatic primary PS were randomized: 60 in the K group and 62 in the UM group. Both groups were homogeneous.</div><div>There were statistically significant differences between surgery and postoperative complications at 15 and 30 days in favor of UM. There were also differences in favor of UM in surgical time and return to daily activity. During the 90-day follow-up, there were three recurrences in the UM group and 0 in the K group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>UM is a simple, minimally invasive, easily reproducible technique that has a lower rate of early complications, with a shorter operative time and an earlier return to daily activity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":"103 1","pages":"Pages 25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X24002355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The treatment of pilonidal sinus (PS) is usually surgical, but no procedure is considered the gold standard. The Karydakis (K) technique is widely used, and unroofing and marsupialization (UM) is a simple surgery with good results.

Primary objective

To evaluate early postoperative complications (EPC) 30 days after UM surgery compared to the K technique.

Secondary objectives

To evaluate surgical time, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, return to daily activity and early recurrence within 3 months.

Method

Prospective, single-center, randomized study in patients who underwent surgery for primary PS with no abscess between June 2016 and November 2017. They were randomized using a computer-generated block method. To analyze the main objective, a non-inferiority analysis was performed.

Results

One hundred twenty-two patients with symptomatic primary PS were randomized: 60 in the K group and 62 in the UM group. Both groups were homogeneous.
There were statistically significant differences between surgery and postoperative complications at 15 and 30 days in favor of UM. There were also differences in favor of UM in surgical time and return to daily activity. During the 90-day follow-up, there were three recurrences in the UM group and 0 in the K group.

Conclusions

UM is a simple, minimally invasive, easily reproducible technique that has a lower rate of early complications, with a shorter operative time and an earlier return to daily activity.

Abstract Image

与Karydakis技术相比,拟合、角质层和有袋动物治疗毛状体乳房的短期结果。随机前瞻性研究
摘要:治疗毛突窦(PS)通常采用外科手术,但没有一种手术被认为是金标准。Karydakis (K)技术被广泛应用,去顶和有袋化(UM)是一种简单而效果良好的手术。主要目的评价UM术后30天早期并发症(EPC)与K技术的比较。次要目的评估手术时间、术后疼痛、患者满意度、日常活动恢复情况和3个月内早期复发情况。方法前瞻性、单中心、随机研究,纳入2016年6月至2017年11月期间接受无脓肿手术的原发性PS患者。他们使用计算机生成的分组方法随机分组。为了分析主要目的,进行了非劣效性分析。结果122例有症状的原发性PS患者随机分为:K组60例,UM组62例。两组都是同质的。在15天和30天的手术和术后并发症方面,UM有统计学上的显著差异。在手术时间和恢复日常活动方面,UM也存在差异。在90天的随访中,UM组有3例复发,K组0例复发。结论sum手术方法简单,微创,重复性好,早期并发症发生率低,手术时间短,恢复正常生活时间早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cirugia Espanola
Cirugia Espanola SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信