Análisis de ganglios coincidentes con SentiMag® y técnica estándar en la BSGC del cáncer de mama

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Cristina Isabel Davó Pérez, Virginia Pellicer Sánchez, Edelmira Soliveres Soliveres, María José Cases Baldó, Arantxa Cabrera Vilanova, Lorena Rodríguez Cazalla, Piotr Kosny, Miguel Ángel Morcillo Rodenas
{"title":"Análisis de ganglios coincidentes con SentiMag® y técnica estándar en la BSGC del cáncer de mama","authors":"Cristina Isabel Davó Pérez,&nbsp;Virginia Pellicer Sánchez,&nbsp;Edelmira Soliveres Soliveres,&nbsp;María José Cases Baldó,&nbsp;Arantxa Cabrera Vilanova,&nbsp;Lorena Rodríguez Cazalla,&nbsp;Piotr Kosny,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Morcillo Rodenas","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In breast cancer surgery, there are techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) that do not require nuclear medicine, such as SentiMag®, which uses ferromagnetic particles. The main purpose of this analysis is to study the degree of concordance in SLNB between SentiMag® and the standard method (Tc99 radiotracer). The secondary objective is to identify factors that impact in sentinel node detection rate and matching detection rate between both probes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational and retrospective study performed from January to December 2021 focused on patients undergoing breast surgery and SLNB who were injected with both tracers, the ferromagnetic SentiMag® and Tc99 radiotracer. Once the diagnostic accuracy tests were performed, a further evaluation of the detection rate for each probe and the concordance between probes were accomplished. After those results, a deeper analysis of differences in detection rates for each probe and concordance between probes were assessed for various factors: neoadjuvant therapy, BMI, mitotic index, and triple-negative immunohistochemical profile.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The clinical study had a sample size of 70 patients. The overall false-negative rate (FNR) was 4.3%. The detection rate was the same for each technique (85.7%). A total of 106 nodes were biopsied, with a concordance rate of 70.75%. Significant differences were found in concordant nodes according to neoadjuvant therapy (<em>p</em>-value 0.012). For the Ki-67 factor (&lt;20 or ≥20), significant differences were found in detected nodes (<em>p</em>-value 0.031 gamma probe; <em>p</em>-value 0.124 SentiMag®).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The detection rates of SentiMag® and the gamma probe are equivalent. The application of the dual technique minimizes the FNR. A high mitotic index affects the detection rate of the gamma probe, and neoadjuvant therapy negatively impacts the concordance rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":"103 1","pages":"Pages 11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X24002227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In breast cancer surgery, there are techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) that do not require nuclear medicine, such as SentiMag®, which uses ferromagnetic particles. The main purpose of this analysis is to study the degree of concordance in SLNB between SentiMag® and the standard method (Tc99 radiotracer). The secondary objective is to identify factors that impact in sentinel node detection rate and matching detection rate between both probes.

Methods

Observational and retrospective study performed from January to December 2021 focused on patients undergoing breast surgery and SLNB who were injected with both tracers, the ferromagnetic SentiMag® and Tc99 radiotracer. Once the diagnostic accuracy tests were performed, a further evaluation of the detection rate for each probe and the concordance between probes were accomplished. After those results, a deeper analysis of differences in detection rates for each probe and concordance between probes were assessed for various factors: neoadjuvant therapy, BMI, mitotic index, and triple-negative immunohistochemical profile.

Results

The clinical study had a sample size of 70 patients. The overall false-negative rate (FNR) was 4.3%. The detection rate was the same for each technique (85.7%). A total of 106 nodes were biopsied, with a concordance rate of 70.75%. Significant differences were found in concordant nodes according to neoadjuvant therapy (p-value 0.012). For the Ki-67 factor (<20 or ≥20), significant differences were found in detected nodes (p-value 0.031 gamma probe; p-value 0.124 SentiMag®).

Conclusions

The detection rates of SentiMag® and the gamma probe are equivalent. The application of the dual technique minimizes the FNR. A high mitotic index affects the detection rate of the gamma probe, and neoadjuvant therapy negatively impacts the concordance rate.

Abstract Image

SentiMag®匹配节分析和BSGC乳腺癌标准技术
在乳腺癌手术中,有不需要核医学的前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)技术,如SentiMag®,它使用铁磁颗粒。本分析的主要目的是研究SentiMag®与标准方法(Tc99放射性示踪剂)在SLNB中的一致性程度。次要目标是确定影响前哨节点检出率和两个探针之间匹配检出率的因素。方法于2021年1月至12月对接受乳房手术和SLNB的患者进行观察性和回顾性研究,这些患者注射了两种示踪剂,铁磁性的SentiMag®和Tc99放射性示踪剂。诊断准确性测试完成后,对每个探针的检出率和探针之间的一致性进行进一步评估。在这些结果之后,对每个探针的检出率差异和探针之间的一致性进行更深入的分析,评估各种因素:新辅助治疗、BMI、有丝分裂指数和三阴性免疫组织化学谱。结果临床研究样本量为70例。总假阴性率(FNR)为4.3%。两种方法的检出率均为85.7%。共活检106例,符合率为70.75%。经新辅助治疗后的和谐淋巴结差异有统计学意义(p值为0.012)。对于Ki-67因子(<;20或≥20),在检测到的淋巴结中发现显著差异(p值为0.031;p值0.124 SentiMag®)。结论SentiMag®与γ探针的检出率相当。双重技术的应用使FNR最小化。高有丝分裂指数影响γ探针的检出率,新辅助治疗对一致性率有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cirugia Espanola
Cirugia Espanola SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信