{"title":"The importance of outliers in forensic practice","authors":"Roger W. Byard , Melissa Humphries","doi":"10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forensic pathologists and practitioners are well aware of the number of unique or unusual cases that are not infrequently seen in a busy medicolegal practice. Unfortunately the importance of isolated cases is sometimes dismissed by those who feel that such outliers merely skew datasets and provide nothing useful in terms of analyses. Applying a statistical approach to forensic observations does, however, run the risk of losing quite valuable information that assists in understanding mechanisms and outcomes of disease and injury. Data derived from randomised controlled trials and observational studies should not be mutually exclusive as a single outlier may give much clearer understanding of possible pathophysiological mechanisms than a group of more mainstream cases. Clearly both have their uses in contributing to the literature and in helping to evaluate and analyse cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102810"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X25000113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forensic pathologists and practitioners are well aware of the number of unique or unusual cases that are not infrequently seen in a busy medicolegal practice. Unfortunately the importance of isolated cases is sometimes dismissed by those who feel that such outliers merely skew datasets and provide nothing useful in terms of analyses. Applying a statistical approach to forensic observations does, however, run the risk of losing quite valuable information that assists in understanding mechanisms and outcomes of disease and injury. Data derived from randomised controlled trials and observational studies should not be mutually exclusive as a single outlier may give much clearer understanding of possible pathophysiological mechanisms than a group of more mainstream cases. Clearly both have their uses in contributing to the literature and in helping to evaluate and analyse cases.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine publishes topical articles on aspects of forensic and legal medicine. Specifically the Journal supports research that explores the medical principles of care and forensic assessment of individuals, whether adult or child, in contact with the judicial system. It is a fully peer-review hybrid journal with a broad international perspective.
The Journal accepts submissions of original research, review articles, and pertinent case studies, editorials, and commentaries in relevant areas of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Context of Practice, and Education and Training.
The Journal adheres to strict publication ethical guidelines, and actively supports a culture of inclusive and representative publication.