Work Related Pain in Gynecologic Surgeons - A National Survey.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Riley J Young, Alexis Allen, Donald McIntire, Erica F Robinson, Olga Bougie, Kimberly A Kho
{"title":"Work Related Pain in Gynecologic Surgeons - A National Survey.","authors":"Riley J Young, Alexis Allen, Donald McIntire, Erica F Robinson, Olga Bougie, Kimberly A Kho","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>The objectives of the study are to 1) ascertain the prevalence of work-related pain amongst gynecologic surgeons, 2) describe risk factors and sequelae of pain and 3) assess the need for an ergonomic curriculum.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The survey was electronically administered.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Gynecologic surgery subspecialists and fellows in training were included, as well as Ob/Gyn Specialists who perform gynecologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>A 38-question anonymous survey was developed from available ergonomic literature and had three main sections 1) demographic information, 2) pain history and 3) ergonomic education.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>305 gynecologic surgeons participated. 76.7% identified as female. Most respondents were Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeons (64.6%) with a primary surgical modality of conventional laparoscopy (65.6%). 95.7% of respondents reported pain during or after surgery. Female surgeons (p = .018), shorter surgeons (OR = 2.4, 95% CI [1.1, 5.4]), and those with a smaller glove size (p = .025) were more likely to report severe pain. Surgeons who reported worse pain were more likely to seek treatment (p = .007) and take time off from operating (p < .001). 79.4% of respondents report engaging in a variety of interventions to treat surgery-related pain. Due to pain, 23.9% report changing surgical modality and 62.5% of surgeons are concerned about their ability to operate in the future. 61.3% of surgeons did not feel confident in their ability to ergonomically set up their operating room. 98.0% recommend formal ergonomic training for residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons are at risk for work-related pain. Gynecologic surgeons are an understudied population with specific ergonomic challenges. In this national survey of high-volume gynecologic surgeons of various subspecialities, we report a high rate of surgery-related pain, significant clinical and nonclinical sequelae of pain, and demonstrate a need for implementing and improving ergonomic training for Obstetrics and Gynecology trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: The objectives of the study are to 1) ascertain the prevalence of work-related pain amongst gynecologic surgeons, 2) describe risk factors and sequelae of pain and 3) assess the need for an ergonomic curriculum.

Study design: Survey study.

Setting: The survey was electronically administered.

Participants: Gynecologic surgery subspecialists and fellows in training were included, as well as Ob/Gyn Specialists who perform gynecologic surgery.

Measurements: A 38-question anonymous survey was developed from available ergonomic literature and had three main sections 1) demographic information, 2) pain history and 3) ergonomic education.

Main results: 305 gynecologic surgeons participated. 76.7% identified as female. Most respondents were Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeons (64.6%) with a primary surgical modality of conventional laparoscopy (65.6%). 95.7% of respondents reported pain during or after surgery. Female surgeons (p = .018), shorter surgeons (OR = 2.4, 95% CI [1.1, 5.4]), and those with a smaller glove size (p = .025) were more likely to report severe pain. Surgeons who reported worse pain were more likely to seek treatment (p = .007) and take time off from operating (p < .001). 79.4% of respondents report engaging in a variety of interventions to treat surgery-related pain. Due to pain, 23.9% report changing surgical modality and 62.5% of surgeons are concerned about their ability to operate in the future. 61.3% of surgeons did not feel confident in their ability to ergonomically set up their operating room. 98.0% recommend formal ergonomic training for residents.

Conclusions: Surgeons are at risk for work-related pain. Gynecologic surgeons are an understudied population with specific ergonomic challenges. In this national survey of high-volume gynecologic surgeons of various subspecialities, we report a high rate of surgery-related pain, significant clinical and nonclinical sequelae of pain, and demonstrate a need for implementing and improving ergonomic training for Obstetrics and Gynecology trainees.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信