Near vision assessment for adults using the NIH Toolbox.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382
John-Christopher A Finley, Jerry Slotkin, Cindy J Nowinski, Katy Bedjeti, Nicholas Volpe, Sandra Weintraub, Richard Gershon
{"title":"Near vision assessment for adults using the NIH Toolbox.","authors":"John-Christopher A Finley, Jerry Slotkin, Cindy J Nowinski, Katy Bedjeti, Nicholas Volpe, Sandra Weintraub, Richard Gershon","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test is a novel digitized measure designed to provide an assessment of near vision in a time-and cost-effective manner. This study is the first to report the psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test in a sample of community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-eight adults (ages 40-81) completed the tablet-based near vision test and the gold standard chart-based near vision test. Performance on the tablet-and chart-based near vision tests was expressed in logarithmic units. Chart-and tablet-based administration order was counterbalanced. To assess test-retest reliability, the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was administered twice within the same day. Additionally, two equivalent versions of the chart-based test were randomly assigned to participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed that test-retest reliability of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was good (intraclass correlation = 0.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Concurrence between the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test and gold standard chart-based test was also good (<i>r</i> = 0.79, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings provide support for the reliability and validity of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test as a near vision assessment for middle-aged to older adult populations. With further research, the integration of this test within the widely used NIH Toolbox may provide a more efficient means to understanding how near visual acuity influences neurocognitive test performance and brain function in middle-aged to older adult populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1533382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test is a novel digitized measure designed to provide an assessment of near vision in a time-and cost-effective manner. This study is the first to report the psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test in a sample of community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.

Methods: Ninety-eight adults (ages 40-81) completed the tablet-based near vision test and the gold standard chart-based near vision test. Performance on the tablet-and chart-based near vision tests was expressed in logarithmic units. Chart-and tablet-based administration order was counterbalanced. To assess test-retest reliability, the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was administered twice within the same day. Additionally, two equivalent versions of the chart-based test were randomly assigned to participants.

Results: Analyses revealed that test-retest reliability of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was good (intraclass correlation = 0.87, p < 0.001). Concurrence between the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test and gold standard chart-based test was also good (r = 0.79, p < 0.001).

Discussion: Findings provide support for the reliability and validity of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test as a near vision assessment for middle-aged to older adult populations. With further research, the integration of this test within the widely used NIH Toolbox may provide a more efficient means to understanding how near visual acuity influences neurocognitive test performance and brain function in middle-aged to older adult populations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信