A Comparison of Medium Probability Versus High Probability Instructions to Increase Cooperation in the Context of the High Probability Instructional Sequence

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
David A. Wilder, Christina Sheppard, Franchesca Izquierdo, Kira Flynn
{"title":"A Comparison of Medium Probability Versus High Probability Instructions to Increase Cooperation in the Context of the High Probability Instructional Sequence","authors":"David A. Wilder,&nbsp;Christina Sheppard,&nbsp;Franchesca Izquierdo,&nbsp;Kira Flynn","doi":"10.1002/bin.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The high-probability instructional sequence has been shown to be effective to increase cooperation with low-probability requests. However, for some individuals, it may be difficult to identify high-probability instructions, and some high-probability instructions may become less likely to evoke cooperation over time. Thus, under some circumstances medium probability instructions, or instructions which may be less likely to evoke cooperation than high-probability instructions, may be a useful temporary alternative to increase cooperation. In the current study, we compared medium probability instructions to high probability instructions to increase cooperation among three children with autism spectrum disorder. The results showed that for two participants, the medium probability instructions improved cooperation as much as the high-probability instructions. For a third participant, the medium probability instructions improved cooperation over baseline, but not to the level observed with the high-probability instructions. Results are discussed in terms of the mechanisms responsible for the effects of instructional sequences.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high-probability instructional sequence has been shown to be effective to increase cooperation with low-probability requests. However, for some individuals, it may be difficult to identify high-probability instructions, and some high-probability instructions may become less likely to evoke cooperation over time. Thus, under some circumstances medium probability instructions, or instructions which may be less likely to evoke cooperation than high-probability instructions, may be a useful temporary alternative to increase cooperation. In the current study, we compared medium probability instructions to high probability instructions to increase cooperation among three children with autism spectrum disorder. The results showed that for two participants, the medium probability instructions improved cooperation as much as the high-probability instructions. For a third participant, the medium probability instructions improved cooperation over baseline, but not to the level observed with the high-probability instructions. Results are discussed in terms of the mechanisms responsible for the effects of instructional sequences.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信