The treatment of gynaecological and intra-abdominal infections: a comparative study of cefotetan versus netilmicin plus clindamycin.

J Poularas, H Giamarellou, G Vlachos, R Theakou, J Patoulis, N Lekakos, J Stavridis, P Sfikakis
{"title":"The treatment of gynaecological and intra-abdominal infections: a comparative study of cefotetan versus netilmicin plus clindamycin.","authors":"J Poularas,&nbsp;H Giamarellou,&nbsp;G Vlachos,&nbsp;R Theakou,&nbsp;J Patoulis,&nbsp;N Lekakos,&nbsp;J Stavridis,&nbsp;P Sfikakis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a prospective randomised study 60 patients with gynaecological or intra-abdominal infections were given either 2g iv every 12 hours of cefotetan or a combination of netilmicin (150mg iv every 12 hours) and clindamycin (600mg iv every 8 hours). The clinical condition of nearly half the patients (26 of 60) was characterized as serious and surgical manipulation and drainage were performed in 57 of the 60 patients. The clinical response was similar in both groups with 21 of 29 patients in the cefotetan group and 29 of 33 patients in the netilmicin plus clindamycin group. Side effects were few and mild in nature with no significant differences between the two groups. This work is continuing but the results to date suggest that cefotetan monotherapy is a safe and effective alternative to a combination of netilmicin and clindamycin in the treatment of gynaecological and intra-abdominal infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":9733,"journal":{"name":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","volume":"7 4","pages":"253-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a prospective randomised study 60 patients with gynaecological or intra-abdominal infections were given either 2g iv every 12 hours of cefotetan or a combination of netilmicin (150mg iv every 12 hours) and clindamycin (600mg iv every 8 hours). The clinical condition of nearly half the patients (26 of 60) was characterized as serious and surgical manipulation and drainage were performed in 57 of the 60 patients. The clinical response was similar in both groups with 21 of 29 patients in the cefotetan group and 29 of 33 patients in the netilmicin plus clindamycin group. Side effects were few and mild in nature with no significant differences between the two groups. This work is continuing but the results to date suggest that cefotetan monotherapy is a safe and effective alternative to a combination of netilmicin and clindamycin in the treatment of gynaecological and intra-abdominal infections.

妇科和腹腔感染的治疗:头孢替坦与奈替米星加克林霉素的比较研究。
在一项前瞻性随机研究中,60名患有妇科或腹腔感染的患者每12小时给予2g静脉注射头孢替坦或奈替米星(150mg静脉注射每12小时)和克林霉素(600mg静脉注射每8小时)的联合治疗。近一半患者(60例中26例)的临床状况为严重,其中57例患者进行了手术操作和引流。两组的临床反应相似,头孢替坦组29例患者中有21例,奈替米星加克林霉素组33例患者中有29例。两组间副作用少且轻微,无显著差异。这项工作仍在继续,但迄今为止的结果表明,头孢替坦单药治疗是一种安全有效的替代奈替米星和克林霉素联合治疗妇科和腹腔内感染的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信