Measuring implicit carbon prices of renewable energy incentives: Insights from China

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Yifei Quan , Maosheng Duan , Chongjia Luo
{"title":"Measuring implicit carbon prices of renewable energy incentives: Insights from China","authors":"Yifei Quan ,&nbsp;Maosheng Duan ,&nbsp;Chongjia Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implicit carbon prices (ICP), akin to explicit carbon prices derived from carbon pricing instruments, reflect the climate mitigation efforts of specific jurisdictions through non-carbon pricing policies. In this paper, we propose a transparent and systematic methodology for measuring the implicit carbon price related to renewable energy incentives, which represents average abatement cost of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions resulting from renewable support policies. Applying this method, we evaluate China's ICPs of renewable policies from 2009 to 2021. We find that China's country-level ICP rose upward from 2.01 CNY in 2009 to 44.64 CNY in 2021, peaking at 47.70 CNY in 2019. This price level is on par with explicit carbon price in the early stage of China's national emissions trading system, highlighting the country's substantial efforts to address climate change by deploying renewables. Scrutiny of different provinces and renewable generation technologies uncovers great variations in ICPs, which implies significant heterogeneity in abatement costs and policy efficiency within the renewable energy sector. While our analysis focuses on China, the method is easily adaptable to other jurisdictions as a useful tool for assessing mitigation efforts and identifying effective emission reduction instruments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 101656"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625000067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implicit carbon prices (ICP), akin to explicit carbon prices derived from carbon pricing instruments, reflect the climate mitigation efforts of specific jurisdictions through non-carbon pricing policies. In this paper, we propose a transparent and systematic methodology for measuring the implicit carbon price related to renewable energy incentives, which represents average abatement cost of CO2 emissions resulting from renewable support policies. Applying this method, we evaluate China's ICPs of renewable policies from 2009 to 2021. We find that China's country-level ICP rose upward from 2.01 CNY in 2009 to 44.64 CNY in 2021, peaking at 47.70 CNY in 2019. This price level is on par with explicit carbon price in the early stage of China's national emissions trading system, highlighting the country's substantial efforts to address climate change by deploying renewables. Scrutiny of different provinces and renewable generation technologies uncovers great variations in ICPs, which implies significant heterogeneity in abatement costs and policy efficiency within the renewable energy sector. While our analysis focuses on China, the method is easily adaptable to other jurisdictions as a useful tool for assessing mitigation efforts and identifying effective emission reduction instruments.
衡量可再生能源激励的隐含碳价格:来自中国的见解
隐性碳价格(ICP)类似于从碳定价工具中得出的显性碳价格,反映了特定司法管辖区通过非碳定价政策减缓气候变化的努力。在本文中,我们提出了一种透明和系统的方法来衡量与可再生能源激励相关的隐性碳价格,它代表了可再生能源支持政策导致的二氧化碳排放的平均减排成本。应用该方法,我们评估了2009年至2021年中国可再生能源政策的icp。我们发现,中国的国家级ICP从2009年的2.01元上升到2021年的44.64元,2019年达到47.70元的峰值。这一价格水平与中国国家排放交易体系初期的明确碳价相当,突显出中国通过部署可再生能源来应对气候变化的巨大努力。对不同省份和可再生能源发电技术的仔细研究发现,icp存在巨大差异,这意味着可再生能源部门在减排成本和政策效率方面存在显著差异。虽然我们的分析主要集中在中国,但作为评估减排努力和确定有效减排工具的有用工具,该方法很容易适用于其他司法管辖区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信