Safety evaluation and prediction of overtaking behaviors in heterogeneous traffic considering dynamic trust and automated driving styles

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Jie Pan, Jing Shi
{"title":"Safety evaluation and prediction of overtaking behaviors in heterogeneous traffic considering dynamic trust and automated driving styles","authors":"Jie Pan,&nbsp;Jing Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated vehicles (AVs) face a critical need to evaluate and predict the risk of various driving maneuvers, especially in complex driving scenarios such as overtaking human-driven vehicles (HDVs). However, overtaking safety performance evaluation and prediction rarely take into account dynamic trust and AV driving styles. Moreover, the adequacy of the time window length for data collection prior to overtaking, critical for risk prediction, remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to evaluate overtaking safety performance on two-lane highways considering drivers’ dynamic trust and different AV driving styles, and predict overtaking risk focusing on the impact of different time window lengths. 47 participants were tasked with a simulated overtaking experiment involving both impeding and opposite automated vehicles (IAV and OAV) that exhibited either defensive or aggressive driving styles. Dynamic trust and subjective risk were assessed through a questionnaire after each overtaking maneuver, and objective risk was evaluated using time-to-collision-threshold Driving Risk Field method. Results show that the driving styles of IAV and OAV significantly impacted dynamic trust, objective risk and subjective risk. As dynamic trust in AVs increases, subjective risk decreases but an apparent rise in objective risk is noted, highlighting the importance of controlling over-trust. Results also illustrate that an aggressive IAV leads to a reduction of both following distance to the IAV and lateral distance to the roadside. Additionally, the time window length significantly influenced the prediction performance and a 1.5-second window was found to be optimal using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine model, achieving an accuracy of 92.3% and an F1-score of 0.905. By incorporating this insight, AVs can better anticipate and respond to the intentions of human drivers, leading to safer interactions on the road.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 383-398"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated vehicles (AVs) face a critical need to evaluate and predict the risk of various driving maneuvers, especially in complex driving scenarios such as overtaking human-driven vehicles (HDVs). However, overtaking safety performance evaluation and prediction rarely take into account dynamic trust and AV driving styles. Moreover, the adequacy of the time window length for data collection prior to overtaking, critical for risk prediction, remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to evaluate overtaking safety performance on two-lane highways considering drivers’ dynamic trust and different AV driving styles, and predict overtaking risk focusing on the impact of different time window lengths. 47 participants were tasked with a simulated overtaking experiment involving both impeding and opposite automated vehicles (IAV and OAV) that exhibited either defensive or aggressive driving styles. Dynamic trust and subjective risk were assessed through a questionnaire after each overtaking maneuver, and objective risk was evaluated using time-to-collision-threshold Driving Risk Field method. Results show that the driving styles of IAV and OAV significantly impacted dynamic trust, objective risk and subjective risk. As dynamic trust in AVs increases, subjective risk decreases but an apparent rise in objective risk is noted, highlighting the importance of controlling over-trust. Results also illustrate that an aggressive IAV leads to a reduction of both following distance to the IAV and lateral distance to the roadside. Additionally, the time window length significantly influenced the prediction performance and a 1.5-second window was found to be optimal using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine model, achieving an accuracy of 92.3% and an F1-score of 0.905. By incorporating this insight, AVs can better anticipate and respond to the intentions of human drivers, leading to safer interactions on the road.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信