Reconstructing construction safety Training: A systematic review based on learning theories and instructional design principles

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Mahdi Rasouli , Hossein Karimi , Javad Hatami
{"title":"Reconstructing construction safety Training: A systematic review based on learning theories and instructional design principles","authors":"Mahdi Rasouli ,&nbsp;Hossein Karimi ,&nbsp;Javad Hatami","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The construction industry faces a high rate of safety accidents. Despite being a critical component of safety management, safety training often falls short of expectations. This shortcoming has been attributed to the insufficient integration of Learning Theories (LTs) and Instructional Design (ID) principles in Construction Safety Training (CST). This paper presents a systematic review of CST, incorporating insights from prominent ID sources, including ID elements (objective, session <span><span>scheduling</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, content, tools and methods, learning tasks, and evaluation) and the most prominent LTs. The extent of adherence to these principles and theories in previous CST studies has been evaluated by reviewing 48 CST papers to identify opportunities for improvement. Recommendations for enhancing future CSTs include a) targeting Affective objectives, b) avoiding single-session condensed training, c) incorporating task-based training, d) conducting follow-up and long-term evaluations of knowledge and behavior, and e) incorporating LTs and Principles of Instruction explicitly and systematically. This study compared student training with site worker training, as well as training with and without computer tools, to identify gaps and provide tailored recommendations to improve each type of training. The findings lay the groundwork for integrating ID knowledge into CST, avoiding ID errors, and ultimately enhancing CST’s efficiency to reduce accidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106769"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352400359X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction industry faces a high rate of safety accidents. Despite being a critical component of safety management, safety training often falls short of expectations. This shortcoming has been attributed to the insufficient integration of Learning Theories (LTs) and Instructional Design (ID) principles in Construction Safety Training (CST). This paper presents a systematic review of CST, incorporating insights from prominent ID sources, including ID elements (objective, session scheduling, content, tools and methods, learning tasks, and evaluation) and the most prominent LTs. The extent of adherence to these principles and theories in previous CST studies has been evaluated by reviewing 48 CST papers to identify opportunities for improvement. Recommendations for enhancing future CSTs include a) targeting Affective objectives, b) avoiding single-session condensed training, c) incorporating task-based training, d) conducting follow-up and long-term evaluations of knowledge and behavior, and e) incorporating LTs and Principles of Instruction explicitly and systematically. This study compared student training with site worker training, as well as training with and without computer tools, to identify gaps and provide tailored recommendations to improve each type of training. The findings lay the groundwork for integrating ID knowledge into CST, avoiding ID errors, and ultimately enhancing CST’s efficiency to reduce accidents.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信