Development and external validation of a machine learning model to predict the initial dose of vancomycin for targeting an area under the concentration–time curve of 400–600 mg∙h/L

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yun Woo Lee , Ji-Hun Kim , Jin Ju Park , Hyejin Park , Hyeonji Seo , Yong Kyun Kim
{"title":"Development and external validation of a machine learning model to predict the initial dose of vancomycin for targeting an area under the concentration–time curve of 400–600 mg∙h/L","authors":"Yun Woo Lee ,&nbsp;Ji-Hun Kim ,&nbsp;Jin Ju Park ,&nbsp;Hyejin Park ,&nbsp;Hyeonji Seo ,&nbsp;Yong Kyun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop and validate a novel artificial intelligence model for predicting the initial empiric dose of vancomycin, with the aim of achieving an area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of 400–600 mg∙h/L, using individual clinical data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Machine learning models were developed and validated internally and externally using data from adult patients who received intravenous vancomycin treatment between November 2020 and June 2023, using records from July to September 2023, sourced from two hospitals. This study included 205, 44, and 35 patients in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. The Random Forest, XGBoost, and Ensemble models were evaluated based on the mean squared error, root mean squared error, R-squared value, and accuracy (±20 % of the actual dose).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>In internal validation, the Random Forest model achieved the highest 20% Accuracy at 56.8%, while the XGBoost model achieved 56.8% and Voting Ensemble models attained 54.5% accuracy. In external validation, the XGBoost model achieved the highest 20% Accuracy at 74.3%, followed by Random Forest and Voting Ensemble, both also achieving 74.3% accuracy. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was the most significant predictor in all models, with body weight, serum creatinine, height, and age also prominently influencing the XGBoost model’s predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>The proposed model is capable of accurately predicting the optimal dose of vancomycin, which could aid physicians in making more informed treatment decisions regarding early therapy, particularly when AUC estimation systems are not accessible or readily available in routine clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105817"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and validate a novel artificial intelligence model for predicting the initial empiric dose of vancomycin, with the aim of achieving an area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of 400–600 mg∙h/L, using individual clinical data.

Methods

Machine learning models were developed and validated internally and externally using data from adult patients who received intravenous vancomycin treatment between November 2020 and June 2023, using records from July to September 2023, sourced from two hospitals. This study included 205, 44, and 35 patients in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. The Random Forest, XGBoost, and Ensemble models were evaluated based on the mean squared error, root mean squared error, R-squared value, and accuracy (±20 % of the actual dose).

Findings

In internal validation, the Random Forest model achieved the highest 20% Accuracy at 56.8%, while the XGBoost model achieved 56.8% and Voting Ensemble models attained 54.5% accuracy. In external validation, the XGBoost model achieved the highest 20% Accuracy at 74.3%, followed by Random Forest and Voting Ensemble, both also achieving 74.3% accuracy. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was the most significant predictor in all models, with body weight, serum creatinine, height, and age also prominently influencing the XGBoost model’s predictions.

Implications

The proposed model is capable of accurately predicting the optimal dose of vancomycin, which could aid physicians in making more informed treatment decisions regarding early therapy, particularly when AUC estimation systems are not accessible or readily available in routine clinical practice.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信