Complete blood count in neonatal Intensive care Unit (NICU): Performance comparison between POCT Sight OLO® and Sysmex XN-9100™ hematology analyzers

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Francesca Nencini , Alessandro Bonari , Sara Ciullini Mannurita , Alessandra Mongia , Francesca Romano , Maria Garieri , Edda Russo , Silvia Sastrucci , Graziella Marrani , Martina Tonelli , Stefano Salti , Niccola Funel , Amedeo Amedei , Carlo Dani , Alessandra Fanelli
{"title":"Complete blood count in neonatal Intensive care Unit (NICU): Performance comparison between POCT Sight OLO® and Sysmex XN-9100™ hematology analyzers","authors":"Francesca Nencini ,&nbsp;Alessandro Bonari ,&nbsp;Sara Ciullini Mannurita ,&nbsp;Alessandra Mongia ,&nbsp;Francesca Romano ,&nbsp;Maria Garieri ,&nbsp;Edda Russo ,&nbsp;Silvia Sastrucci ,&nbsp;Graziella Marrani ,&nbsp;Martina Tonelli ,&nbsp;Stefano Salti ,&nbsp;Niccola Funel ,&nbsp;Amedeo Amedei ,&nbsp;Carlo Dani ,&nbsp;Alessandra Fanelli","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>The use of a POCT (Point Of Care Test) could help in reducing the impact of pre-analytical errors in particular in challenging newborn samples.</div><div>The study purpose is to compare the POCT Sight OLO® hematology analyzer, validated for &gt;3 months patients, with the reference system Sysmex XN-9100™ in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The two analyzers were compared through Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plot.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 65 blood samples, in detail 38 from adults and 27 from newborns.</div><div>The regression analysis results performed in the newborn and adult patients showed a good agreement between the two instruments. The evaluation of the Bland-Altman plots showed comparable values of bias &lt;10 % for the most of parameters.</div><div>The evaluation of sample flags for the presence of distributional and morphological abnormalities showed a partial accordance between the two approaches, but the POCT exhibited good performance compared to the final report revised by the laboratory specialist.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The comparison of the two instruments demonstrated that they provide comparable blood counts, also in patients aged &lt;3 months. The POCT allows having reliable analytical data and faster turning around time, particularly useful in NICU.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article e00453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255172500006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

The use of a POCT (Point Of Care Test) could help in reducing the impact of pre-analytical errors in particular in challenging newborn samples.
The study purpose is to compare the POCT Sight OLO® hematology analyzer, validated for >3 months patients, with the reference system Sysmex XN-9100™ in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).

Material and methods

The two analyzers were compared through Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plot.

Results

We analyzed 65 blood samples, in detail 38 from adults and 27 from newborns.
The regression analysis results performed in the newborn and adult patients showed a good agreement between the two instruments. The evaluation of the Bland-Altman plots showed comparable values of bias <10 % for the most of parameters.
The evaluation of sample flags for the presence of distributional and morphological abnormalities showed a partial accordance between the two approaches, but the POCT exhibited good performance compared to the final report revised by the laboratory specialist.

Conclusions

The comparison of the two instruments demonstrated that they provide comparable blood counts, also in patients aged <3 months. The POCT allows having reliable analytical data and faster turning around time, particularly useful in NICU.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信