Valid knowledge of performance provided by a motion capturing system in shot put.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1482701
Stefan Künzell, Anna Knoblich, Annika Stippler
{"title":"Valid knowledge of performance provided by a motion capturing system in shot put.","authors":"Stefan Künzell, Anna Knoblich, Annika Stippler","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1482701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extended feedback on knowledge of performance in sports techniques is very challenging and requires a high level of expertise. This poses a significant problem for experiments on providing extended feedback, as it is essential to ensure that the \"correct\" feedback is given for it to be effective. In this study, we investigate whether the correct feedback can be determined based on kinematic data. Ten participants and one model were recorded during shot put using a Motion Capturing (MoCap) system and simultaneously captured on video. The videos were analysed by two experts, and the two most critical errors were noted. By qualitatively comparing the deviations of the participants from the model, the experts' error feedback was identified in the motion curves of the MoCap system. The expert feedback for two participants was sealed in an envelope. In a qualitative analysis of the motion data, the error feedback was then determined and subsequently compared with the experts' feedback. These error feedbacks largely matched. It was shown that, in principle, it is possible to extract errors from the kinematic angle and distance curves of the movement. This study opens the door to an automated version of the qualitative assessment of movements by AI. Further research can now focus on the topic of conveying AI-generated feedback. This could then also provide a valid foundation for experiments on the effects of knowledge of performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"6 ","pages":"1482701"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1482701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extended feedback on knowledge of performance in sports techniques is very challenging and requires a high level of expertise. This poses a significant problem for experiments on providing extended feedback, as it is essential to ensure that the "correct" feedback is given for it to be effective. In this study, we investigate whether the correct feedback can be determined based on kinematic data. Ten participants and one model were recorded during shot put using a Motion Capturing (MoCap) system and simultaneously captured on video. The videos were analysed by two experts, and the two most critical errors were noted. By qualitatively comparing the deviations of the participants from the model, the experts' error feedback was identified in the motion curves of the MoCap system. The expert feedback for two participants was sealed in an envelope. In a qualitative analysis of the motion data, the error feedback was then determined and subsequently compared with the experts' feedback. These error feedbacks largely matched. It was shown that, in principle, it is possible to extract errors from the kinematic angle and distance curves of the movement. This study opens the door to an automated version of the qualitative assessment of movements by AI. Further research can now focus on the topic of conveying AI-generated feedback. This could then also provide a valid foundation for experiments on the effects of knowledge of performance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信