Open Versus Minimally Invasive Morgagni Hernia Repair in Pediatric Surgery: A Review.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Dorsa Safari, Zahra Mohajer, Farbod Ghobadinezhad, Bahar Ashjaei
{"title":"Open Versus Minimally Invasive Morgagni Hernia Repair in Pediatric Surgery: A Review.","authors":"Dorsa Safari, Zahra Mohajer, Farbod Ghobadinezhad, Bahar Ashjaei","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Morgagni hernia (MH), a rare type of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, does not have an established protocol for surgical repair. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A MEDLINE search with terms related to various surgical approaches to repair MH in children was conducted. Articles comprising robotic-assisted surgery, laparoscopy, laparotomy, thoracoscopy, and thoracotomy over the last 20 years were assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> This narrative review provides an overview of MH in the pediatric population, covering the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of this rare diaphragmatic hernia. We discuss various surgical techniques, including open and minimally invasive approaches, and compare their advantages and limitations in childhood MH repair. In addition, we address arguments for and against controversial topics such as hernia sac excision and patch reinforcement. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Regarding MH in children, transabdominal repair is superior to transthoracic due to improved visualization of bilateral defects and easier reduction of the hernia contents. Laparoscopy has been reported as a popular approach. Single-site laparoscopy has gained attention due to better outcomes than standard three-port laparoscopy. Considering a limited number of children in the literature who underwent robotic MH repair, perioperative complications were reported to be minor.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Morgagni hernia (MH), a rare type of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, does not have an established protocol for surgical repair. Materials and Methods: A MEDLINE search with terms related to various surgical approaches to repair MH in children was conducted. Articles comprising robotic-assisted surgery, laparoscopy, laparotomy, thoracoscopy, and thoracotomy over the last 20 years were assessed. Results: This narrative review provides an overview of MH in the pediatric population, covering the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of this rare diaphragmatic hernia. We discuss various surgical techniques, including open and minimally invasive approaches, and compare their advantages and limitations in childhood MH repair. In addition, we address arguments for and against controversial topics such as hernia sac excision and patch reinforcement. Conclusions: Regarding MH in children, transabdominal repair is superior to transthoracic due to improved visualization of bilateral defects and easier reduction of the hernia contents. Laparoscopy has been reported as a popular approach. Single-site laparoscopy has gained attention due to better outcomes than standard three-port laparoscopy. Considering a limited number of children in the literature who underwent robotic MH repair, perioperative complications were reported to be minor.

背景:Morgagni 疝(MH)是一种罕见的先天性膈疝(diaphragmatic hernia),目前尚无成熟的手术修补方案。材料与方法:在 MEDLINE 中检索了与修复儿童 MH 的各种手术方法相关的术语。对过去 20 年中包括机器人辅助手术、腹腔镜手术、开腹手术、胸腔镜手术和开胸手术的文章进行了评估。结果:这篇叙述性综述概述了小儿膈疝的流行病学、诊断和治疗。我们讨论了各种手术技术,包括开放式和微创方法,并比较了它们在儿童膈疝修补术中的优势和局限性。此外,我们还讨论了支持和反对疝囊切除和补片加固等争议性话题的理由。结论:在儿童疝修补术中,经腹修补术优于经胸修补术,因为经腹修补术能更好地观察双侧疝缺损,并更容易缩小疝内容物。据报道,腹腔镜是一种常用的方法。与标准的三孔腹腔镜手术相比,单部位腹腔镜手术的疗效更好,因此备受关注。考虑到文献中接受机器人MH修补术的儿童数量有限,据报道围手术期并发症较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信