Conscientiousness, Public Service Motivation, Resilience, and Work Engagement among Volunteers in Lebanon.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatric Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s11126-025-10115-z
Hussein Mreydem, Issa Kamal Eddine, Moussa Hojeij, Han Sung Lee, Pascale Salameh, Seockhoon Chung
{"title":"Conscientiousness, Public Service Motivation, Resilience, and Work Engagement among Volunteers in Lebanon.","authors":"Hussein Mreydem, Issa Kamal Eddine, Moussa Hojeij, Han Sung Lee, Pascale Salameh, Seockhoon Chung","doi":"10.1007/s11126-025-10115-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study using an online survey to explore the personality traits of volunteers in Lebanon and examine their relationship with work engagement, psychological status, resilience, and public service motivation. A total of 270 volunteers were recruited through social media platforms. The survey included general questions about volunteering, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 items (UWES-9), the Big Five Personality Inventory-10 (BFPI-10), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), the Public Service Motivation (PSM), and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2 (CD-RISC2). The results revealed that agreeableness and conscientiousness levels were significantly lower among volunteers with low work engagement compared to those with high work engagement. Work engagement was positively correlated with agreeableness and conscientiousness and negatively correlated with neuroticism. Logistic regression showed that being single with a low level of conscientiousness, public service motivation, and resilience predicted low work engagement. Mediation analysis showed that conscientiousness, public service motivation, and resilience directly influenced work engagement, and depression mediated the relationship of conscientiousness and resilience with work engagement. This study highlights the importance of personality traits, mental health, and motivation in understanding work engagement among volunteers, which can help in designing strategies to enhance volunteers' experiences, well-being, and productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"227-240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-025-10115-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study using an online survey to explore the personality traits of volunteers in Lebanon and examine their relationship with work engagement, psychological status, resilience, and public service motivation. A total of 270 volunteers were recruited through social media platforms. The survey included general questions about volunteering, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 items (UWES-9), the Big Five Personality Inventory-10 (BFPI-10), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), the Public Service Motivation (PSM), and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2 (CD-RISC2). The results revealed that agreeableness and conscientiousness levels were significantly lower among volunteers with low work engagement compared to those with high work engagement. Work engagement was positively correlated with agreeableness and conscientiousness and negatively correlated with neuroticism. Logistic regression showed that being single with a low level of conscientiousness, public service motivation, and resilience predicted low work engagement. Mediation analysis showed that conscientiousness, public service motivation, and resilience directly influenced work engagement, and depression mediated the relationship of conscientiousness and resilience with work engagement. This study highlights the importance of personality traits, mental health, and motivation in understanding work engagement among volunteers, which can help in designing strategies to enhance volunteers' experiences, well-being, and productivity.

黎巴嫩志愿者的责任心、公共服务动机、弹性和工作投入。
我们使用在线调查进行了一项描述性分析横断面研究,以探索黎巴嫩志愿者的人格特征,并检查他们与工作投入、心理状态、弹性和公共服务动机的关系。通过社交媒体平台共招募了270名志愿者。调查内容包括志愿服务的一般问题、乌得勒支工作投入量表-9 (uwes9)、大五人格量表-10 (BFPI-10)、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7 (GAD-7)、公共服务动机量表(PSM)和康诺-戴维森弹性量表-2 (CD-RISC2)。结果显示,与工作投入高的志愿者相比,工作投入低的志愿者的宜人性和尽责性水平明显较低。工作投入与宜人性、尽责性正相关,与神经质负相关。Logistic回归结果显示,单身人士的责任心、公共服务动机和弹性水平较低,预示着较低的工作投入。中介分析表明,责任心、公共服务动机和心理弹性直接影响工作投入,抑郁在责任心、心理弹性与工作投入的关系中起中介作用。本研究强调了人格特质、心理健康和动机在理解志愿者工作投入中的重要性,这有助于设计提高志愿者体验、幸福感和工作效率的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信