A model of care redesign within rheumatology: A mixed methods approach integrating nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

IF 1.2 4区 医学
Lisa Carnago, Kristin Holbrook, David Leverenz, Allison Dimsdale
{"title":"A model of care redesign within rheumatology: A mixed methods approach integrating nurse practitioners and physician assistants.","authors":"Lisa Carnago, Kristin Holbrook, David Leverenz, Allison Dimsdale","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing patient demand and clinician burnout in rheumatology practices have highlighted the need for more efficient models of care (MOC). Interprofessional collaboration is essential for improving patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Our current MOC lacks standardization and formal integration of Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and Physician Assistants (PAs), resulting in reduced clinician satisfaction and limited patient access. To optimize care quality, clinician satisfaction, and patient access, we sought to develop an interprofessional MOC tailored to an academic rheumatology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed methods sequential-exploratory design within a quality improvement (QI) framework to create a blueprint for MOC redesign.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Intervention development proceeded in four phases: needs assessment, data collection, socializing key ideas, and team design and planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the needs assessment phase, divisional leadership was interviewed to identify shared goals for an optimized MOC. Data collection included surveys distributed to 12 physicians and 8 NPs/PAs, addressing 11 key domains related to current and future MOC needs. In phase 3, we communicated key findings to divisional leadership, clinicians, and staff. Phase 4 involved iterative team building and MOC design. Survey results revealed low satisfaction with the current MOC and a strong preference for parallel practice, standardization, and formal NP/Physician Assistant integration. Several barriers to MOC implementation were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Redesigning the MOC in rheumatology requires aligning clinician, leadership, and organizational priorities. A mixed methods QI approach effectively uncovers clinical needs and potential barriers, supporting the successful implementation of a new MOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing patient demand and clinician burnout in rheumatology practices have highlighted the need for more efficient models of care (MOC). Interprofessional collaboration is essential for improving patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction.

Local problem: Our current MOC lacks standardization and formal integration of Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and Physician Assistants (PAs), resulting in reduced clinician satisfaction and limited patient access. To optimize care quality, clinician satisfaction, and patient access, we sought to develop an interprofessional MOC tailored to an academic rheumatology practice.

Methods: We used a mixed methods sequential-exploratory design within a quality improvement (QI) framework to create a blueprint for MOC redesign.

Intervention: Intervention development proceeded in four phases: needs assessment, data collection, socializing key ideas, and team design and planning.

Results: In the needs assessment phase, divisional leadership was interviewed to identify shared goals for an optimized MOC. Data collection included surveys distributed to 12 physicians and 8 NPs/PAs, addressing 11 key domains related to current and future MOC needs. In phase 3, we communicated key findings to divisional leadership, clinicians, and staff. Phase 4 involved iterative team building and MOC design. Survey results revealed low satisfaction with the current MOC and a strong preference for parallel practice, standardization, and formal NP/Physician Assistant integration. Several barriers to MOC implementation were also identified.

Conclusion: Redesigning the MOC in rheumatology requires aligning clinician, leadership, and organizational priorities. A mixed methods QI approach effectively uncovers clinical needs and potential barriers, supporting the successful implementation of a new MOC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信