Diane N Haddad, Justin S Hatchimonji, Ella C Eisinger, Angela T Chen, Kristen M Chreiman, Omar I Ramadan, Anna U Morgan, M Kit Delgado, Niels D Martin, Mark J Seamon, Lisa M Knowlton, Elinore J Kaufman
{"title":"Awaiting insurance coverage: Medicaid enrollment and post-acute care use after traumatic injury.","authors":"Diane N Haddad, Justin S Hatchimonji, Ella C Eisinger, Angela T Chen, Kristen M Chreiman, Omar I Ramadan, Anna U Morgan, M Kit Delgado, Niels D Martin, Mark J Seamon, Lisa M Knowlton, Elinore J Kaufman","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lack of insurance after traumatic injury is associated with decreased use of postacute care and poor outcomes. Insurance linkage programs enroll eligible patients in Medicaid at the time of an unplanned admission. We hypothesized that Medicaid enrollment would be associated with increased use of postacute care, but also with prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) while awaiting insurance authorization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked trauma registry and EMR data to identify patients ages 18 years to 64 years admitted from 2017 to 2021 to a Level I trauma center. Patients admitted without insurance and retroactively insured (RI) during hospitalization were compared with patients with established Medicaid (MI) and those remaining uninsured (UI). We measured postacute care use including home health care, rehabilitation, and skilled nursing facilities. We tested the association between insurance status and discharge disposition and LOS (primary outcome) using multivariable negative binomial regression. Direct costs were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared 494 RI patients to 1706 MI and 148 UI patients. Retroactively insured patients had longer hospitalization (median LOS [interquartile range], 4 days [2-9 days]) than other groups (MI, 4 [2-8] and UI 2 [1-3]), p < 0.001). Retroactively insured patients were more likely to be discharged with home health care and to inpatient rehabilitation than UI patients (p < 0.001). After adjusting for injury and management characteristics, RI was associated with longer LOS compared with MI for patients discharged to inpatient facilities (p < 0.001). Median costs for RI patients discharged to a facility were $10,284 higher than MI patients, ranging from $8,582 for Injury Severity Score <9 to $51,883 for Injury Severity Score ≥25.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enrollment in Medicaid after traumatic injury is associated with postacute care use, but the current enrollment process may delay discharge. Streamlining insurance enrollment and permitting discharge with pending application status could reduce unnecessary hospital days, saving costs and improving improve patient experience.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Lack of insurance after traumatic injury is associated with decreased use of postacute care and poor outcomes. Insurance linkage programs enroll eligible patients in Medicaid at the time of an unplanned admission. We hypothesized that Medicaid enrollment would be associated with increased use of postacute care, but also with prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) while awaiting insurance authorization.
Methods: We linked trauma registry and EMR data to identify patients ages 18 years to 64 years admitted from 2017 to 2021 to a Level I trauma center. Patients admitted without insurance and retroactively insured (RI) during hospitalization were compared with patients with established Medicaid (MI) and those remaining uninsured (UI). We measured postacute care use including home health care, rehabilitation, and skilled nursing facilities. We tested the association between insurance status and discharge disposition and LOS (primary outcome) using multivariable negative binomial regression. Direct costs were compared between groups.
Results: We compared 494 RI patients to 1706 MI and 148 UI patients. Retroactively insured patients had longer hospitalization (median LOS [interquartile range], 4 days [2-9 days]) than other groups (MI, 4 [2-8] and UI 2 [1-3]), p < 0.001). Retroactively insured patients were more likely to be discharged with home health care and to inpatient rehabilitation than UI patients (p < 0.001). After adjusting for injury and management characteristics, RI was associated with longer LOS compared with MI for patients discharged to inpatient facilities (p < 0.001). Median costs for RI patients discharged to a facility were $10,284 higher than MI patients, ranging from $8,582 for Injury Severity Score <9 to $51,883 for Injury Severity Score ≥25.
Conclusion: Enrollment in Medicaid after traumatic injury is associated with postacute care use, but the current enrollment process may delay discharge. Streamlining insurance enrollment and permitting discharge with pending application status could reduce unnecessary hospital days, saving costs and improving improve patient experience.
Level of evidence: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level IV.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.