Treatment of café-au-lait macules with picosecond and nanosecond 1064-nm nd: YAG laser: a retrospective study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tianzi Wang, Yan Lin, Lingyu Mao, Xueping Yu, Zhenzhen Wang, Huaxu Liu, Furen Zhang
{"title":"Treatment of café-au-lait macules with picosecond and nanosecond 1064-nm nd: YAG laser: a retrospective study.","authors":"Tianzi Wang, Yan Lin, Lingyu Mao, Xueping Yu, Zhenzhen Wang, Huaxu Liu, Furen Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04296-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the efficacy and safety of picosecond (PS) and nanosecond (NS) 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) laser in treating Café-au-lait macules (CALMs). We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with CALMs, who were treated with PS or NS 1064-nm lasers from January 2020 to January 2022. The efficacy was determined based on the before and after pictures by two independent investigators. The incidence of adverse events and recurrence were explored after treatments. A total of 116 patients (83 in the PS group and 33 in the NS group) were recruited. For subjects in the PS group, after 1-9 sessions, the lesion clearance was poor in 15 patients (18.1%), fair in 29 (34.9%), good in 14 (16.9%), and excellent in 25 (30.1%). In the NS group, after 1-7 sessions, the lesion clearance was poor, fair, good, and excellent in 7 (21.2%), 8 (24.2%), 13 (39.4%), and 5 (15.2%) patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the two lasers (p > 0.05). The incidence of complications (hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation) in the PS group (16.9%) was numerically lower than in the NS group (24.2%) (p = 0.136). Among patients who responded well to the treatment, 10.3% of patients in the PS group experienced relapse, compared with 22.2% in the NS group (p = 0.926). The PS 1064-nm laser provided comparable efficacy and potentially fewer complications compared with the NS laser in treating CALMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04296-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy and safety of picosecond (PS) and nanosecond (NS) 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) laser in treating Café-au-lait macules (CALMs). We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with CALMs, who were treated with PS or NS 1064-nm lasers from January 2020 to January 2022. The efficacy was determined based on the before and after pictures by two independent investigators. The incidence of adverse events and recurrence were explored after treatments. A total of 116 patients (83 in the PS group and 33 in the NS group) were recruited. For subjects in the PS group, after 1-9 sessions, the lesion clearance was poor in 15 patients (18.1%), fair in 29 (34.9%), good in 14 (16.9%), and excellent in 25 (30.1%). In the NS group, after 1-7 sessions, the lesion clearance was poor, fair, good, and excellent in 7 (21.2%), 8 (24.2%), 13 (39.4%), and 5 (15.2%) patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the two lasers (p > 0.05). The incidence of complications (hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation) in the PS group (16.9%) was numerically lower than in the NS group (24.2%) (p = 0.136). Among patients who responded well to the treatment, 10.3% of patients in the PS group experienced relapse, compared with 22.2% in the NS group (p = 0.926). The PS 1064-nm laser provided comparable efficacy and potentially fewer complications compared with the NS laser in treating CALMs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信