How does the medicines retail sector ensure continued access to medicines during public health emergencies? Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2418977
Eleanor Hutchinson, Sunday Mundua, Jessica Myers, Sian E Clarke, Kristian Schultz Hansen, Chrispus Mayora, Freddie Ssengooba, Freddy Eric Kitutu
{"title":"How does the medicines retail sector ensure continued access to medicines during public health emergencies? Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda.","authors":"Eleanor Hutchinson, Sunday Mundua, Jessica Myers, Sian E Clarke, Kristian Schultz Hansen, Chrispus Mayora, Freddie Ssengooba, Freddy Eric Kitutu","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2418977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The medicines retail sector (MRS) enables access to life-saving health commodities. Despite efforts to harness this market for public health goals, in low- and middle-income countries it is rarely incorporated into pandemic preparedness. This paper analyses the role of the MRS in the response to COVID-19 in Uganda, the extent to which it was incorporated into national planning and in the continuity of essential services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using sequential mixed methods in two purposively sampled rural districts in central Uganda. Qualitative research comprised 27 focus group discussions with drug shop vendors (DSVs), pharmacists, clinic staff and community members across two districts (<i>n</i> = 250); key informant interviews at national (<i>n</i> = 6) and district (<i>n</i> = 11) levels. Qualitative findings were used to modify a facility-based survey conducted in MRS outlets (<i>n</i> = 625). A household survey focusing on household dynamics and treatment seeking during COVID-19 was conducted in both districts (<i>n</i> = 1680).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the national level, attempts were made to involve the MRS in policy and technical advice but this was not sustained. At the district level, almost no effort was made to include the MRS in the response to COVID-19. In the community, residents described their reliance on the MRS to provide medicines, especially during lockdowns. Medicine sellers subject to stringent rules on their movement during lockdown, reported some disruptions in tracer medicine stocks and an increase in prices at their suppliers. They adapted, finding new ways to purchase medicines but overall sales of medicines fell.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRS is critical to the distribution of medicines in many countries. This remains the case or can be heightened during health crises. Pandemic preparedness must incorporate strategies to support medicine sellers to ensure ongoing access to commodities during public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2418977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2418977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The medicines retail sector (MRS) enables access to life-saving health commodities. Despite efforts to harness this market for public health goals, in low- and middle-income countries it is rarely incorporated into pandemic preparedness. This paper analyses the role of the MRS in the response to COVID-19 in Uganda, the extent to which it was incorporated into national planning and in the continuity of essential services.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using sequential mixed methods in two purposively sampled rural districts in central Uganda. Qualitative research comprised 27 focus group discussions with drug shop vendors (DSVs), pharmacists, clinic staff and community members across two districts (n = 250); key informant interviews at national (n = 6) and district (n = 11) levels. Qualitative findings were used to modify a facility-based survey conducted in MRS outlets (n = 625). A household survey focusing on household dynamics and treatment seeking during COVID-19 was conducted in both districts (n = 1680).

Results: At the national level, attempts were made to involve the MRS in policy and technical advice but this was not sustained. At the district level, almost no effort was made to include the MRS in the response to COVID-19. In the community, residents described their reliance on the MRS to provide medicines, especially during lockdowns. Medicine sellers subject to stringent rules on their movement during lockdown, reported some disruptions in tracer medicine stocks and an increase in prices at their suppliers. They adapted, finding new ways to purchase medicines but overall sales of medicines fell.

Conclusions: The MRS is critical to the distribution of medicines in many countries. This remains the case or can be heightened during health crises. Pandemic preparedness must incorporate strategies to support medicine sellers to ensure ongoing access to commodities during public health emergencies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信