Response to initial treatment with glucocorticoids in TAFRO syndrome and implications for secondary treatment.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Ryutaro Tominaga, Kento Umino, Seina Honda, Daizo Yokoyama, Atsuto Noguchi, Shuka Furuki, Shunsuke Koyama, Rui Murahashi, Hirotomo Nakashima, Kazuki Hyodo, Shin-Ichiro Kawaguchi, Yumiko Toda, Daisuke Minakata, Masahiro Ashizawa, Chihiro Yamamoto, Kaoru Hatano, Kazuya Sato, Ken Ohmine, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Yoshinobu Kanda
{"title":"Response to initial treatment with glucocorticoids in TAFRO syndrome and implications for secondary treatment.","authors":"Ryutaro Tominaga, Kento Umino, Seina Honda, Daizo Yokoyama, Atsuto Noguchi, Shuka Furuki, Shunsuke Koyama, Rui Murahashi, Hirotomo Nakashima, Kazuki Hyodo, Shin-Ichiro Kawaguchi, Yumiko Toda, Daisuke Minakata, Masahiro Ashizawa, Chihiro Yamamoto, Kaoru Hatano, Kazuya Sato, Ken Ohmine, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Yoshinobu Kanda","doi":"10.1007/s12185-025-03933-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of various initial treatments incorporating glucocorticoid (GC) in TAFRO syndrome (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly). Cases of TAFRO syndrome up to November 2023 were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) and resistance to GC therapy were assessed, with resistance analyzed based on the time to the next treatment or death (TTNTD). The study included 95 patients, including 5 diagnosed at our hospital. OS did not differ significantly between patients who received GC monotherapy and those who had a second-line therapy added within 2 weeks (100-day OS rate: 86.6% vs. 77.7%; p = 0.338). Moreover, 100-day OS did not differ between patients who received GC pulse therapy within 2 weeks and those who did not (77.5% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.129). In multivariate analyses, pretreatment severity score ≥ 8 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-8.50) and platelets ≥ 6.9 × 10^4/µL (HR, 2.26; 95% CI 1.01-5.02) were significantly associated with shorter TTNTD. Additional second-line or GC pulse therapy provided no advantage in the hyperacute phase. Higher severity scores and platelet values may predict resistance to GC therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13992,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-025-03933-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of various initial treatments incorporating glucocorticoid (GC) in TAFRO syndrome (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly). Cases of TAFRO syndrome up to November 2023 were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) and resistance to GC therapy were assessed, with resistance analyzed based on the time to the next treatment or death (TTNTD). The study included 95 patients, including 5 diagnosed at our hospital. OS did not differ significantly between patients who received GC monotherapy and those who had a second-line therapy added within 2 weeks (100-day OS rate: 86.6% vs. 77.7%; p = 0.338). Moreover, 100-day OS did not differ between patients who received GC pulse therapy within 2 weeks and those who did not (77.5% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.129). In multivariate analyses, pretreatment severity score ≥ 8 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-8.50) and platelets ≥ 6.9 × 10^4/µL (HR, 2.26; 95% CI 1.01-5.02) were significantly associated with shorter TTNTD. Additional second-line or GC pulse therapy provided no advantage in the hyperacute phase. Higher severity scores and platelet values may predict resistance to GC therapy.

TAFRO综合征初始糖皮质激素治疗的反应及其对二次治疗的影响。
本研究旨在探讨糖皮质激素(GC)对TAFRO综合征(血小板减少、贫血、发热、网状蛋白纤维化和器官肿大)的不同初始治疗效果。回顾性收集截至2023年11月的TAFRO综合征病例。评估总生存期(OS)和对GC治疗的耐药性,并根据到下一次治疗或死亡的时间(TTNTD)分析耐药性。本研究纳入95例患者,其中5例在我院确诊。接受GC单药治疗的患者和在2周内增加二线治疗的患者之间的OS无显著差异(100天OS率:86.6% vs 77.7%;p = 0.338)。此外,在2周内接受GC脉冲治疗的患者与未接受GC脉冲治疗的患者之间的100天OS无差异(77.5% vs 93.1%, p = 0.129)。多因素分析中,预处理严重程度评分≥8分(风险比[HR], 2.99;95%可信区间[CI] 1.05-8.50),血小板≥6.9 × 10^4/µL (HR, 2.26;95% CI 1.01-5.02)与较短的TTNTD显著相关。额外的二线或GC脉冲治疗在超急性期没有优势。较高的严重程度评分和血小板值可能预测对GC治疗的耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hematology, the official journal of the Japanese Society of Hematology, has a long history of publishing leading research in hematology. The journal comprises articles that contribute to progress in research not only in basic hematology but also in clinical hematology, aiming to cover all aspects of this field, namely, erythrocytes, leukocytes and hematopoiesis, hemostasis, thrombosis and vascular biology, hematological malignancies, transplantation, and cell therapy. The expanded [Progress in Hematology] section integrates such relevant fields as the cell biology of stem cells and cancer cells, and clinical research in inflammation, cancer, and thrombosis. Reports on results of clinical trials are also included, thus contributing to the aim of fostering communication among researchers in the growing field of modern hematology. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on modern hematology, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信