Extended intrauterine balloon stent use to prevent adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a randomized trial.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yiyang Luo, Yuhuan Liu, Yu Xiao, Qiaoyun Zhou, Zhoulin Zhang, Xiaoyu Li
{"title":"Extended intrauterine balloon stent use to prevent adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a randomized trial.","authors":"Yiyang Luo, Yuhuan Liu, Yu Xiao, Qiaoyun Zhou, Zhoulin Zhang, Xiaoyu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.01.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of retaining a balloon stent in the uterus for 8 weeks to prevent adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-center randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 160 women with severe intrauterine adhesions (American Fertility Society intrauterine adhesion scores ≥9 and European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy grade ≥IV).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The participants were randomized 1:1 into two groups. In the study group, the balloon stent was left in place for 8 weeks after surgery and removed at the second-look hysteroscopy, with a third-look hysteroscopy performed 4 weeks later. In the control group, the balloon stent was maintained for 1 week, with participants undergoing second- and third-look hysteroscopies at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively, respectively. Among 160 randomized patients, 136 (69 and 67 in the study and control groups, respectively) completed the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the adhesion recurrence rate on third-look hysteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On third-look hysteroscopy, the adhesion reformation was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (17.4% vs. 43.3%; relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.72; rate difference, -25.89%; 95% confidence interval, -40.75% to -11.04%). Additionally, the reduction in American Fertility Society adhesion scores was significantly larger in the study group than in the control group (10 vs. 7). The outcomes of the second- and third-look hysteroscopies were consistent. No safety concerns were observed regarding extended stent placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this randomized controlled study, extending the balloon stent application to 8 weeks proved an effective and safe method for preventing adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for severe intrauterine adhesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.01.024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of retaining a balloon stent in the uterus for 8 weeks to prevent adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.

Design: A single-center randomized controlled study.

Subjects: A total of 160 women with severe intrauterine adhesions (American Fertility Society intrauterine adhesion scores ≥9 and European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy grade ≥IV).

Intervention: The participants were randomized 1:1 into two groups. In the study group, the balloon stent was left in place for 8 weeks after surgery and removed at the second-look hysteroscopy, with a third-look hysteroscopy performed 4 weeks later. In the control group, the balloon stent was maintained for 1 week, with participants undergoing second- and third-look hysteroscopies at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively, respectively. Among 160 randomized patients, 136 (69 and 67 in the study and control groups, respectively) completed the study.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the adhesion recurrence rate on third-look hysteroscopy.

Results: On third-look hysteroscopy, the adhesion reformation was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (17.4% vs. 43.3%; relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.72; rate difference, -25.89%; 95% confidence interval, -40.75% to -11.04%). Additionally, the reduction in American Fertility Society adhesion scores was significantly larger in the study group than in the control group (10 vs. 7). The outcomes of the second- and third-look hysteroscopies were consistent. No safety concerns were observed regarding extended stent placement.

Conclusion: In this randomized controlled study, extending the balloon stent application to 8 weeks proved an effective and safe method for preventing adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for severe intrauterine adhesions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信