Ensifentrine in COPD patients taking long-acting bronchodilators: A pooled post-hoc analysis of the ENHANCE-1/2 studies.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Mark Dransfield, Nathaniel Marchetti, Ravi Kalhan, Daniel Reyner, Amy L Dixon, Tara Rheault, Kathleen Ann Rickard, Antonio Anzueto
{"title":"Ensifentrine in COPD patients taking long-acting bronchodilators: A pooled post-hoc analysis of the ENHANCE-1/2 studies.","authors":"Mark Dransfield, Nathaniel Marchetti, Ravi Kalhan, Daniel Reyner, Amy L Dixon, Tara Rheault, Kathleen Ann Rickard, Antonio Anzueto","doi":"10.1177/14799731251314874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy and safety of ensifentrine, a novel PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor, were previously evaluated in the ENHANCE-1 (NCT04535986) and ENHANCE-2 (NCT04542057) trials. Here, we present a pooled post-hoc subgroup analysis of patients according to background chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) maintenance medication regimens.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ensifentrine in patients receiving long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta-agonists with inhaled corticosteroids (LABA + ICS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients had moderate to severe COPD, were aged 40-80 years, and were symptomatic at randomization. Patients were randomized 5:3, receiving twice-daily ensifentrine 3 mg or placebo via standard jet nebulizer over 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled post-hoc analysis included 485 LAMA patients and 272 LABA + ICS patients. Ensifentrine showed lung function improvement over placebo at week 12, including average FEV<sub>1</sub> AUC<sub>0-12 h</sub> in the LAMA (placebo-corrected least squares mean change from baseline [LSMC], 92 mL; 95% CI, 54, 131; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and LABA + ICS subgroups (LSMC, 74 mL; 95% CI, 27, 121; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Ensifentrine reduced the rate and risk of exacerbations in both LAMA (48% and 50%, respectively) and LABA + ICS (51% and 56%, respectively) subgroups. Ensifentrine-treated patients reported improvement in symptoms and quality of life over 24 weeks. The safety profile of ensifentrine in each subgroup was similar to the profile in the pooled modified intention-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nebulized ensifentrine offers a novel non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator treatment added to existing LAMA or LABA + ICS treatment options in patients with moderate to severe, symptomatic COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251314874"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731251314874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of ensifentrine, a novel PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor, were previously evaluated in the ENHANCE-1 (NCT04535986) and ENHANCE-2 (NCT04542057) trials. Here, we present a pooled post-hoc subgroup analysis of patients according to background chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) maintenance medication regimens.

Objective: This analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ensifentrine in patients receiving long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta-agonists with inhaled corticosteroids (LABA + ICS).

Methods: Eligible patients had moderate to severe COPD, were aged 40-80 years, and were symptomatic at randomization. Patients were randomized 5:3, receiving twice-daily ensifentrine 3 mg or placebo via standard jet nebulizer over 24 weeks.

Results: The pooled post-hoc analysis included 485 LAMA patients and 272 LABA + ICS patients. Ensifentrine showed lung function improvement over placebo at week 12, including average FEV1 AUC0-12 h in the LAMA (placebo-corrected least squares mean change from baseline [LSMC], 92 mL; 95% CI, 54, 131; p < 0.001) and LABA + ICS subgroups (LSMC, 74 mL; 95% CI, 27, 121; p = 0.002). Ensifentrine reduced the rate and risk of exacerbations in both LAMA (48% and 50%, respectively) and LABA + ICS (51% and 56%, respectively) subgroups. Ensifentrine-treated patients reported improvement in symptoms and quality of life over 24 weeks. The safety profile of ensifentrine in each subgroup was similar to the profile in the pooled modified intention-to-treat population.

Conclusions: Nebulized ensifentrine offers a novel non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator treatment added to existing LAMA or LABA + ICS treatment options in patients with moderate to severe, symptomatic COPD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信