Woven EndoBridge 17 device for intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Aaron Rodriguez-Calienes, Nicole M Castillo-Huerta, Juan Vivanco-Suarez, Martha I Vilca-Salas, Diego Bustamante-Paytan, Nagheli Fernanda Borjas-Calderón, Anyela Flor Bruno-Peña, Cristian Morán-Mariños, Oktay Algin, Waldo R Guerrero, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez
{"title":"Woven EndoBridge 17 device for intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Aaron Rodriguez-Calienes, Nicole M Castillo-Huerta, Juan Vivanco-Suarez, Martha I Vilca-Salas, Diego Bustamante-Paytan, Nagheli Fernanda Borjas-Calderón, Anyela Flor Bruno-Peña, Cristian Morán-Mariños, Oktay Algin, Waldo R Guerrero, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1177/19714009251317505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Woven EndoBridge 17 (WEB-17) is the latest advancement in the WEB device family. Comprehensive data on its occlusion rates, procedural complications, and mortality is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the WEB-17 device in intracranial aneurysms (IAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to October 2023 across four databases for studies on IAs treated with WEB 17. Primary outcomes included adequate angiographic occlusion at last follow-up and a composite of intraprocedural and postprocedural complications. Comparative meta-analysis between WEB-17 and its predecessor versions (pvWEB) was performed. Subgroup analyses by IA rupture status were also conducted for the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies with 880 patients and 933 IAs were included. Regarding efficacy, the rate of adequate occlusion at last follow-up was 91% (95% CI 86%-94%) and the complete occlusion rate was 69% (95% CI 65%-73%). Safety outcomes demonstrated a composite complication rate of 7% (95% CI 4%-11%), an intraprocedural complication rate of 7% (95% CI 5%-9%; I2 = 0%), and a postprocedural complication rate of 2% (95% CI 1%-5%; I2 = 0%). No differences were found between WEB-17 and pvWEB in terms of adequate occlusion (WEB-17: 87.7% vs pvWEB: 80.4%; OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.71-2.55) and safety composite outcome (WEB-17: 8.7% vs pvWEB: 10%; OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.51-2.16). Subgroup analysis did not evidence heterogeneity between subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WEB-17 device demonstrates promising efficacy and safety profiles for the treatment of IAs. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited quality of evidence in the included studies. Further prospective, randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251317505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251317505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Woven EndoBridge 17 (WEB-17) is the latest advancement in the WEB device family. Comprehensive data on its occlusion rates, procedural complications, and mortality is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the WEB-17 device in intracranial aneurysms (IAs).

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to October 2023 across four databases for studies on IAs treated with WEB 17. Primary outcomes included adequate angiographic occlusion at last follow-up and a composite of intraprocedural and postprocedural complications. Comparative meta-analysis between WEB-17 and its predecessor versions (pvWEB) was performed. Subgroup analyses by IA rupture status were also conducted for the primary outcomes.

Results: Eleven studies with 880 patients and 933 IAs were included. Regarding efficacy, the rate of adequate occlusion at last follow-up was 91% (95% CI 86%-94%) and the complete occlusion rate was 69% (95% CI 65%-73%). Safety outcomes demonstrated a composite complication rate of 7% (95% CI 4%-11%), an intraprocedural complication rate of 7% (95% CI 5%-9%; I2 = 0%), and a postprocedural complication rate of 2% (95% CI 1%-5%; I2 = 0%). No differences were found between WEB-17 and pvWEB in terms of adequate occlusion (WEB-17: 87.7% vs pvWEB: 80.4%; OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.71-2.55) and safety composite outcome (WEB-17: 8.7% vs pvWEB: 10%; OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.51-2.16). Subgroup analysis did not evidence heterogeneity between subgroups.

Conclusions: The WEB-17 device demonstrates promising efficacy and safety profiles for the treatment of IAs. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited quality of evidence in the included studies. Further prospective, randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信