COMPARING DIRECTIONAL AND OMNIDIRECTIONAL DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE PATIENTS.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROIMAGING
Mazen Kallel, Emmanuel De Schlichting, Valerie Fraix, Anna Castrioto, Elena Moro, Louise Cordier, Eric Seigneuret, Stephan Chabardes
{"title":"COMPARING DIRECTIONAL AND OMNIDIRECTIONAL DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE PATIENTS.","authors":"Mazen Kallel, Emmanuel De Schlichting, Valerie Fraix, Anna Castrioto, Elena Moro, Louise Cordier, Eric Seigneuret, Stephan Chabardes","doi":"10.1159/000542423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2015, directional leads have been released in Europe for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and have been particularly used for subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study we aimed to compare an omnidirectional and directional leads cohort of PD patients when it comes to clinical effectiveness and to assess the correlation with volume of tissue activated - target overlap (VTA-target).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 60 consecutive patients were retrospectively included. 27 patients with bilateral directional leads were compared to 33 patients with bilateral omnidirectional leads. MDS-UPDRS part III scores, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and VTA overlaps using both motor STN region and motor improvement sweetspot volume were compared at 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a significantly higher LEDD reduction in the directional leads group (51.3 % reduction vs 42.7% reduction, p= 0.042) when compared to the omnidirectional group, with similar MDS-UPDRS III motor scores at 12 months. Omnidirectional leads patients had a significantly superior VTA-motor STN overlap volume than directional leads patients (32.01 mm3 vs 20.38 mm2, p = 0.0226). In directional leads patients, LEDD reduction was correlated to VTA overlap with the overall motor improvement mean map sweetspot (R = 0.36, p = 0.036), which was not the case for omnidirectional leads patients (R = 0.11, p = 0.276). Forty one percent of patients implanted with directional leads had a directional stimulation setting at 12 months, compared to thirty three percent at 3 months follow up. In directional leads patient's subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in MDS UPDRS III scores, LEDD reduction, VTA overlaps with motor STN or overall motor improvement mean map sweetspot between patients stimulated omnidirectionally and directionally at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At 12 months, when compared to omnidirectional leads, directional leads manage with smaller VTA-target overlaps to obtain comparable MDS-UPDRS III scores with greater LEDD reduction in STN DBS for PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2015, directional leads have been released in Europe for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and have been particularly used for subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study we aimed to compare an omnidirectional and directional leads cohort of PD patients when it comes to clinical effectiveness and to assess the correlation with volume of tissue activated - target overlap (VTA-target).

Methods: A total of 60 consecutive patients were retrospectively included. 27 patients with bilateral directional leads were compared to 33 patients with bilateral omnidirectional leads. MDS-UPDRS part III scores, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and VTA overlaps using both motor STN region and motor improvement sweetspot volume were compared at 12 months after surgery.

Results: There is a significantly higher LEDD reduction in the directional leads group (51.3 % reduction vs 42.7% reduction, p= 0.042) when compared to the omnidirectional group, with similar MDS-UPDRS III motor scores at 12 months. Omnidirectional leads patients had a significantly superior VTA-motor STN overlap volume than directional leads patients (32.01 mm3 vs 20.38 mm2, p = 0.0226). In directional leads patients, LEDD reduction was correlated to VTA overlap with the overall motor improvement mean map sweetspot (R = 0.36, p = 0.036), which was not the case for omnidirectional leads patients (R = 0.11, p = 0.276). Forty one percent of patients implanted with directional leads had a directional stimulation setting at 12 months, compared to thirty three percent at 3 months follow up. In directional leads patient's subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in MDS UPDRS III scores, LEDD reduction, VTA overlaps with motor STN or overall motor improvement mean map sweetspot between patients stimulated omnidirectionally and directionally at 12 months.

Conclusion: At 12 months, when compared to omnidirectional leads, directional leads manage with smaller VTA-target overlaps to obtain comparable MDS-UPDRS III scores with greater LEDD reduction in STN DBS for PD patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信