The relationship between college students' Suicidal ideation and rejection sensitivity: a network analysis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yang He, Tianqi Yang, Chunyan He, Yuanbei Zhang, Huilin Yang, Shen Huang, Jianjun Liu, Xihong Li, Tao Xu, Shengjun Wu
{"title":"The relationship between college students' Suicidal ideation and rejection sensitivity: a network analysis.","authors":"Yang He, Tianqi Yang, Chunyan He, Yuanbei Zhang, Huilin Yang, Shen Huang, Jianjun Liu, Xihong Li, Tao Xu, Shengjun Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21451-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rejection sensitivity has a controversial impact on suicidal ideation. However, previous studies have always assessed the relationship between rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation as a whole based on total scores, which has obscured the fine-grained relationship between them.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aims to investigate the fine-grained relationship between rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation in college students based on network analysis, and to provide a theoretical basis for identifying potential targets for psychological intervention on suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 663 Chinese college students aged 19-28 years from Xian were investigated in an online study. The Tendency to Expect Rejection Scale (TTERS) and Self-rating Idea of Suicide Scale (SIOSS) were selected to investigate rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation. Rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation networks were constructed using R4.1.1 software to examine the links between the dimensions and to calculate the bridge expected influence (BEI) of each node.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of suicidal ideation among college students was 5.6%. The rejection sensitivity and suicide ideation network contained 23 cross-community edges, with the strongest one being the connection between S3 \"Despair\" and R17 \"No confidence\". Within the suicidal ideation community, S3 \"Despair\" had the highest positive BEI value (0.50). In the rejection sensitivity community, R17 \"No confidence\" exhibited the highest positive BEI value (0.26), whereas R13 \"Sense of collectivity\" had the highest negative BEI value (-0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complex correlation pathways exist between rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation. The bridge centrality indicators identified in this study serve as guides for relevant personnel to implement targeted interventions, thereby effectively preventing and mitigating the emergence and persistence of suicidal ideation among college students.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21451-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rejection sensitivity has a controversial impact on suicidal ideation. However, previous studies have always assessed the relationship between rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation as a whole based on total scores, which has obscured the fine-grained relationship between them.

Objectives: The present study aims to investigate the fine-grained relationship between rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation in college students based on network analysis, and to provide a theoretical basis for identifying potential targets for psychological intervention on suicidal ideation.

Methods: A total of 663 Chinese college students aged 19-28 years from Xian were investigated in an online study. The Tendency to Expect Rejection Scale (TTERS) and Self-rating Idea of Suicide Scale (SIOSS) were selected to investigate rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation. Rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation networks were constructed using R4.1.1 software to examine the links between the dimensions and to calculate the bridge expected influence (BEI) of each node.

Results: The prevalence of suicidal ideation among college students was 5.6%. The rejection sensitivity and suicide ideation network contained 23 cross-community edges, with the strongest one being the connection between S3 "Despair" and R17 "No confidence". Within the suicidal ideation community, S3 "Despair" had the highest positive BEI value (0.50). In the rejection sensitivity community, R17 "No confidence" exhibited the highest positive BEI value (0.26), whereas R13 "Sense of collectivity" had the highest negative BEI value (-0.08).

Conclusions: Complex correlation pathways exist between rejection sensitivity and suicidal ideation. The bridge centrality indicators identified in this study serve as guides for relevant personnel to implement targeted interventions, thereby effectively preventing and mitigating the emergence and persistence of suicidal ideation among college students.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信