Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus graft, comparative study of two tibial fixation devices.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
L Debarre, J Daxhelet, C DE Lavigne, C Parmentier
{"title":"Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus graft, comparative study of two tibial fixation devices.","authors":"L Debarre, J Daxhelet, C DE Lavigne, C Parmentier","doi":"10.52628/90.4.12152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many options are available concerning the graft fixation in ACL reconstruction, one of them being a suspensory device. Our study aimed to compare the strength of two different devices of fixation (suspensory device vs screw) on the tibia. We enrolled 80 patients older than 18 years with an isolated ACL tear confirmed at the MRI, divided into two comparative groups for a prospective study. The only factor which changed was the tibial fixation. The surgical treatment, performed by a unique surgeon, used the same inside-out technique for the two groups, with a ST4-strand graft. Various intraoperative parameters were studied like the time of the tourniquet, the diameter of the graft or an associated meniscus tear. The AP knee laxity was evaluated at 6 months and 1 year after the surgery by a TELOS test. We also compared the two groups with subjective and objective surveys. We can conclude that the suspensory device can offer the same strengthening.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"90 4","pages":"595-601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/90.4.12152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many options are available concerning the graft fixation in ACL reconstruction, one of them being a suspensory device. Our study aimed to compare the strength of two different devices of fixation (suspensory device vs screw) on the tibia. We enrolled 80 patients older than 18 years with an isolated ACL tear confirmed at the MRI, divided into two comparative groups for a prospective study. The only factor which changed was the tibial fixation. The surgical treatment, performed by a unique surgeon, used the same inside-out technique for the two groups, with a ST4-strand graft. Various intraoperative parameters were studied like the time of the tourniquet, the diameter of the graft or an associated meniscus tear. The AP knee laxity was evaluated at 6 months and 1 year after the surgery by a TELOS test. We also compared the two groups with subjective and objective surveys. We can conclude that the suspensory device can offer the same strengthening.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信