A comparative study of the role of carbon fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone and titanium intramedullary nails in patients with metastatic bone disease.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
M Kazzam, A Ahluwalia, G Vles, J Youngman, A Rashid, M Roussot
{"title":"A comparative study of the role of carbon fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone and titanium intramedullary nails in patients with metastatic bone disease.","authors":"M Kazzam, A Ahluwalia, G Vles, J Youngman, A Rashid, M Roussot","doi":"10.52628/90.4.13032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbon fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) implants have gained interest because of reported biomechanical advantages and radio-lucent properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of CFR-PEEK nails in patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD). We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with MBD undergoing intramedullary (IM) nailing for prophylaxis or fixation of pathological fractures using CFR- PEEK or titanium implants. Patient survival, implant failure rates, ability to visualise disease progression on post- operative CT/MRI, and post-operative radiotherapy dose were reported. Fifty patients underwent 56 IM nails (26 CFR-PEEK and 30 titanium). Median survival was 8 months for the entire cohort, 6 months for patients with CFR- PEEK nails and 8 months for those with conventional nails (p=0.691). No implant failures were recorded in either group. There was no correlation between implant type and post-operative radiotherapy dose given (χ 2 = 0.139, p=0.710). Artefact on MRI was less evident with CFR-PEEK nails when hybrid imaging and metal artefact reduction techniques were used. The advantages of CFR-PEEK nails might not be realised in clinical practice for most patients with MBD requiring IM nailing except for in those likely to require prolonged disease surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"90 4","pages":"721-729"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/90.4.13032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) implants have gained interest because of reported biomechanical advantages and radio-lucent properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of CFR-PEEK nails in patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD). We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with MBD undergoing intramedullary (IM) nailing for prophylaxis or fixation of pathological fractures using CFR- PEEK or titanium implants. Patient survival, implant failure rates, ability to visualise disease progression on post- operative CT/MRI, and post-operative radiotherapy dose were reported. Fifty patients underwent 56 IM nails (26 CFR-PEEK and 30 titanium). Median survival was 8 months for the entire cohort, 6 months for patients with CFR- PEEK nails and 8 months for those with conventional nails (p=0.691). No implant failures were recorded in either group. There was no correlation between implant type and post-operative radiotherapy dose given (χ 2 = 0.139, p=0.710). Artefact on MRI was less evident with CFR-PEEK nails when hybrid imaging and metal artefact reduction techniques were used. The advantages of CFR-PEEK nails might not be realised in clinical practice for most patients with MBD requiring IM nailing except for in those likely to require prolonged disease surveillance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信