A New Risk Score Based on Lipid Indicators for Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S505028
Xing Wei, Ziwei Guo, Tingting Zhang, Jun Liang
{"title":"A New Risk Score Based on Lipid Indicators for Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Xing Wei, Ziwei Guo, Tingting Zhang, Jun Liang","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S505028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis is extremely troubling in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prognostic scores have been developed. Yet, the positive predictive values might appear inadequate. This retrospective study aimed to develop a quick and efficient risk score to assess prognosis and clinical response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 391 hCC patients were enrolled and were divided into training and validation groups between 2015 and 2024. Patients were separated into high-risk and low-risk groups using X-tile software. Using the COX proportional risk model analysis method, we then created a risk score and examined them using Kaplan-Meier, time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, and nomogram analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In predicting overall survival (OS), free fatty acid/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (FFHL), tumor size, and BCLC stage were independent prognostic variables. A new risk score was developed just above and used as a prognostic factor (p < 0.001 in the training and validation groups) and had a high time-dependent ROC for progress-free survival (PFS) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.688-0.789 in the training group; AUC 0.592-0.741 in the validation group) and OS (AUC 0.812-0.918 in the training group; AUC 0.692-0.981 in the validation group). In comparison to the best overall response (BOR), the score offered a more accurate evaluation of durable clinical benefit (DCB) (p < 0.001 in the training and validation group; p = 0.061 vs 0.001 in the training and validation group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A new score based on lipid markers is a useful tool for evaluating prognosis and distinguishing patients with DCB.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"107-121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S505028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognosis is extremely troubling in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prognostic scores have been developed. Yet, the positive predictive values might appear inadequate. This retrospective study aimed to develop a quick and efficient risk score to assess prognosis and clinical response.

Methods: A total of 391 hCC patients were enrolled and were divided into training and validation groups between 2015 and 2024. Patients were separated into high-risk and low-risk groups using X-tile software. Using the COX proportional risk model analysis method, we then created a risk score and examined them using Kaplan-Meier, time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, and nomogram analysis.

Results: In predicting overall survival (OS), free fatty acid/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (FFHL), tumor size, and BCLC stage were independent prognostic variables. A new risk score was developed just above and used as a prognostic factor (p < 0.001 in the training and validation groups) and had a high time-dependent ROC for progress-free survival (PFS) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.688-0.789 in the training group; AUC 0.592-0.741 in the validation group) and OS (AUC 0.812-0.918 in the training group; AUC 0.692-0.981 in the validation group). In comparison to the best overall response (BOR), the score offered a more accurate evaluation of durable clinical benefit (DCB) (p < 0.001 in the training and validation group; p = 0.061 vs 0.001 in the training and validation group).

Conclusion: A new score based on lipid markers is a useful tool for evaluating prognosis and distinguishing patients with DCB.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信