[Autologous hamstring versus quadriceps graft in anterior cruciate ligament plasty. Comparative study with focus on Return-To-Sport].

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2025-01-01
R García-Linage, J Lassard-Rosenthal, R Noval-García, A Muñiz-Madrazo, G Fraind-Maya, J Palmero-Picazo, I German-Córdoba, D Zimbrón-López
{"title":"[Autologous hamstring versus quadriceps graft in anterior cruciate ligament plasty. Comparative study with focus on Return-To-Sport].","authors":"R García-Linage, J Lassard-Rosenthal, R Noval-García, A Muñiz-Madrazo, G Fraind-Maya, J Palmero-Picazo, I German-Córdoba, D Zimbrón-López","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>anterior cruciate ligament rupture has evolved to be one of the most common sports injuries with a remarkable increase in its incidence in the last two decades, with Return-To-Sport being a crucial approach in the choice of autologous graft for its surgical repair, the most commonly used being hamstring and quadriceps tendon graft.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a prospective randomized study was performed with 32 patients divided into two groups, one for each type of graft, with 13 patients in each. They were evaluated before surgery, at 30, 180 and 360 days after the procedure using scales such as Lysholm, mCKRS and ACL-RSI, and their previous activity level was considered using the Tegner score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>it was observed that, at 30 and 180 days after surgery, there were significant differences in pain assessment using the VAS scale between the groups, while at 360 days no significant differences were observed. No significant differences were found in Lysholm and mCKRS scale scores in either group at days 30, 180, and 360, but significant differences were found in ACL-RSI scale scores at 30 and 180 days between the two groups, which did not hold at 360 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>despite the difference in postoperative pain, Return-To-Sport times and overall recovery showed no significant differences between the two types of grafts in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"39 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: anterior cruciate ligament rupture has evolved to be one of the most common sports injuries with a remarkable increase in its incidence in the last two decades, with Return-To-Sport being a crucial approach in the choice of autologous graft for its surgical repair, the most commonly used being hamstring and quadriceps tendon graft.

Material and methods: a prospective randomized study was performed with 32 patients divided into two groups, one for each type of graft, with 13 patients in each. They were evaluated before surgery, at 30, 180 and 360 days after the procedure using scales such as Lysholm, mCKRS and ACL-RSI, and their previous activity level was considered using the Tegner score.

Results: it was observed that, at 30 and 180 days after surgery, there were significant differences in pain assessment using the VAS scale between the groups, while at 360 days no significant differences were observed. No significant differences were found in Lysholm and mCKRS scale scores in either group at days 30, 180, and 360, but significant differences were found in ACL-RSI scale scores at 30 and 180 days between the two groups, which did not hold at 360 days.

Conclusion: despite the difference in postoperative pain, Return-To-Sport times and overall recovery showed no significant differences between the two types of grafts in this study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信