Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Pediatric Emergency Department: An Observational Pre-Post Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Erika Silvestro, Ilaria Mussinatto, Antonia Versace, Marco Denina, Giulia Pruccoli, Raffaella Marino, Giulia Mazzetti, Lorenzo Scaglione, Federico Vigna, Alessandra Macciotta, Silvia Garazzino, Claudia Bondone
{"title":"Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Pediatric Emergency Department: An Observational Pre-Post Study.","authors":"Erika Silvestro, Ilaria Mussinatto, Antonia Versace, Marco Denina, Giulia Pruccoli, Raffaella Marino, Giulia Mazzetti, Lorenzo Scaglione, Federico Vigna, Alessandra Macciotta, Silvia Garazzino, Claudia Bondone","doi":"10.3390/children12010046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: To face antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have been implemented in the pediatric age, but the area of urgency remains understudied. We aimed to assess the impact of an educational program on optimizing antibiotic appropriateness in a pediatric ED. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a pre-post observational study with an audit, intervention, and feedback given to prescribers. We recorded all systemic antibiotic prescriptions for children attending our pediatric ED from January to March and from July to September 2020. The study's team assigned a score to each prescription, regarding the appropriate molecule, dose, and duration of therapy, according to the diagnosis. From April to June 2020, we held weekly meetings focusing on different pediatric infectious diseases, with interaction between one to three ED physicians and the infectious disease (ID) specialist of the study's team. We then distributed synthetic digital guidelines adapted to our reality to all prescribers. <b>Results</b>: Optimal antibiotic prescriptions increased after the intervention, with statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in four main aspects (overall adequacy: 13% PRE vs. 43% POST; need of antibiotics: 53% vs. 68%; adequacy of the spectrum: 55% vs. 63%; adequacy of the chosen molecule: 54% vs. 62%). We observed an improvement in all the main infectious diseases and concerns all the ED physicians. The prescription of first-choice drugs increased in specific and common illnesses such as otitis and pharyngotonsillitis. <b>Conclusions</b>: An antimicrobial stewardship program is a relevant method for improving the appropriateness of antimicrobial use also in the complex setting of a pediatric ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12010046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To face antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have been implemented in the pediatric age, but the area of urgency remains understudied. We aimed to assess the impact of an educational program on optimizing antibiotic appropriateness in a pediatric ED. Methods: We conducted a pre-post observational study with an audit, intervention, and feedback given to prescribers. We recorded all systemic antibiotic prescriptions for children attending our pediatric ED from January to March and from July to September 2020. The study's team assigned a score to each prescription, regarding the appropriate molecule, dose, and duration of therapy, according to the diagnosis. From April to June 2020, we held weekly meetings focusing on different pediatric infectious diseases, with interaction between one to three ED physicians and the infectious disease (ID) specialist of the study's team. We then distributed synthetic digital guidelines adapted to our reality to all prescribers. Results: Optimal antibiotic prescriptions increased after the intervention, with statistical significance (p < 0.001) in four main aspects (overall adequacy: 13% PRE vs. 43% POST; need of antibiotics: 53% vs. 68%; adequacy of the spectrum: 55% vs. 63%; adequacy of the chosen molecule: 54% vs. 62%). We observed an improvement in all the main infectious diseases and concerns all the ED physicians. The prescription of first-choice drugs increased in specific and common illnesses such as otitis and pharyngotonsillitis. Conclusions: An antimicrobial stewardship program is a relevant method for improving the appropriateness of antimicrobial use also in the complex setting of a pediatric ED.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信