Identifying Research Priorities for Cognition in CKD: A Delphi Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000708
Jamie Alexiuk, Oksana Harasemiw, Jessica Vanderlinden, Davide Verrelli, Brett Tarca, David Collister, Heitor Ribeiro, Bonnie Corradetti, Kevin Fowler, Fabio Manfredini, Mara McAdams-DeMarco, Nadia Chu, Shilpa Jesudason, Clare McKeaveney, Silvia J Leon, Urmila Anandh, James Tollitt, Stephanie Thompson, Indranil Dasgupta, Clara Bohm
{"title":"Identifying Research Priorities for Cognition in CKD: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Jamie Alexiuk, Oksana Harasemiw, Jessica Vanderlinden, Davide Verrelli, Brett Tarca, David Collister, Heitor Ribeiro, Bonnie Corradetti, Kevin Fowler, Fabio Manfredini, Mara McAdams-DeMarco, Nadia Chu, Shilpa Jesudason, Clare McKeaveney, Silvia J Leon, Urmila Anandh, James Tollitt, Stephanie Thompson, Indranil Dasgupta, Clara Bohm","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognition is a research priority for people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but identification of critical research questions is lacking. This study aimed to determine which cognition-related research questions are most important to CKD stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi technique with 3 survey rounds was used. The study sample included 3 panels (People with lived CKD experience, Researchers, and Clinicians) recruited through international patient and kidney research networks, kidney societies, and snowball sampling with email invitations. Survey rounds were distributed electronically through REDCap. In Round 1 (October 2021-May 2022), respondents contributed three important research questions regarding cognition in CKD (free text). After deduplication and qualitative synthesis, respondents ranked the importance of these questions on a nine-point Likert scale in Round 2 (Feb-April 2023). Questions with mean and median ratings of >7 by at least two respondent panels or rated critically important by the 'lived experience' panel were re-ranked in Round 3 ( Aug-Sept 2023) and assessed for consensus to identify the final list of priority research questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (n=152) identified 125 and 44 discrete questions after Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. The final shortlist included 27 questions in 8 categories. The most critical research question identified was \"What factors prevent cognitive impairment in people receiving dialysis?\" Overall, respondents prioritized questions focusing on prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment. Scores between the panels were significantly different for 16 questions. Those with lived CKD experience prioritized quality of life, researchers emphasized developing interventions to mitigate cognitive impairment, and clinicians prioritized the effect of CKD treatment on cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through an established consensus methodology involving key stakeholder groups, we identified 27 critical research questions about cognition in CKD. These questions should guide future study design and outcome selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognition is a research priority for people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but identification of critical research questions is lacking. This study aimed to determine which cognition-related research questions are most important to CKD stakeholders.

Methods: A modified Delphi technique with 3 survey rounds was used. The study sample included 3 panels (People with lived CKD experience, Researchers, and Clinicians) recruited through international patient and kidney research networks, kidney societies, and snowball sampling with email invitations. Survey rounds were distributed electronically through REDCap. In Round 1 (October 2021-May 2022), respondents contributed three important research questions regarding cognition in CKD (free text). After deduplication and qualitative synthesis, respondents ranked the importance of these questions on a nine-point Likert scale in Round 2 (Feb-April 2023). Questions with mean and median ratings of >7 by at least two respondent panels or rated critically important by the 'lived experience' panel were re-ranked in Round 3 ( Aug-Sept 2023) and assessed for consensus to identify the final list of priority research questions.

Results: Respondents (n=152) identified 125 and 44 discrete questions after Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. The final shortlist included 27 questions in 8 categories. The most critical research question identified was "What factors prevent cognitive impairment in people receiving dialysis?" Overall, respondents prioritized questions focusing on prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment. Scores between the panels were significantly different for 16 questions. Those with lived CKD experience prioritized quality of life, researchers emphasized developing interventions to mitigate cognitive impairment, and clinicians prioritized the effect of CKD treatment on cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: Through an established consensus methodology involving key stakeholder groups, we identified 27 critical research questions about cognition in CKD. These questions should guide future study design and outcome selection.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信