Curative and preemptive treatment of amputee pain by targeted muscle reinnervation: experience from a French military trauma center.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Laurent Mathieu, Claire Redais, Constance Diner, Aurore Lemaire-Petit, Alexia Milaire, Anaïs Chataigneau, Georges Pfister, Nicolas de L'Escalopier
{"title":"Curative and preemptive treatment of amputee pain by targeted muscle reinnervation: experience from a French military trauma center.","authors":"Laurent Mathieu, Claire Redais, Constance Diner, Aurore Lemaire-Petit, Alexia Milaire, Anaïs Chataigneau, Georges Pfister, Nicolas de L'Escalopier","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02701-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a technique that has proven effective for the treatment and prevention of chronic pain following amputation, though its adoption remains limited. The authors report on their initial experience using TMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted in a military trauma center involving traumatic amputees treated with either curative or preemptive TMR. Their outcomes were compared to those of control patients who underwent neuroma burial or simple neurectomy during primary amputation. Data included a numerical rating scale (NRS) and patient-reported outcomes measurement information System (PROMIS) scores evaluating residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients with a median age of 45.5 years were included and followed up for a median period of 13 months. The curative TMR group consisted of 8 patients whose results were compared to those of 9 control patients. There was a significant reduction in almost all pain scores with TMR and only in RPL NRS scores with neuroma burial. Reduction in RLP and PLP scores was significantly greater with TMR. The preemptive TMR group included 10 patients whose results were compared to those of 18 control patients. No significant difference was observed in the postoperative evolution of RLP or PLP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results confirm the benefits of TMR for the curative treatment of RLP and PLP. However, within the limits of this small sample size, preemptive TMR did not show added value. TMR appears to be a complex technique that requires a learning curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02701-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a technique that has proven effective for the treatment and prevention of chronic pain following amputation, though its adoption remains limited. The authors report on their initial experience using TMR.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a military trauma center involving traumatic amputees treated with either curative or preemptive TMR. Their outcomes were compared to those of control patients who underwent neuroma burial or simple neurectomy during primary amputation. Data included a numerical rating scale (NRS) and patient-reported outcomes measurement information System (PROMIS) scores evaluating residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP).

Results: Eighteen patients with a median age of 45.5 years were included and followed up for a median period of 13 months. The curative TMR group consisted of 8 patients whose results were compared to those of 9 control patients. There was a significant reduction in almost all pain scores with TMR and only in RPL NRS scores with neuroma burial. Reduction in RLP and PLP scores was significantly greater with TMR. The preemptive TMR group included 10 patients whose results were compared to those of 18 control patients. No significant difference was observed in the postoperative evolution of RLP or PLP.

Conclusion: These results confirm the benefits of TMR for the curative treatment of RLP and PLP. However, within the limits of this small sample size, preemptive TMR did not show added value. TMR appears to be a complex technique that requires a learning curve.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信