Posterior extent of left anterior temporal lobectomy and picture naming decline.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Insafe Mezjan, Sophie Colnat-Coulbois, Olivier Aron, Mickaël Ferrand, Hélène Brissart, Natacha Forthoffer, Louis Maillard, Fabien Rech
{"title":"Posterior extent of left anterior temporal lobectomy and picture naming decline.","authors":"Insafe Mezjan, Sophie Colnat-Coulbois, Olivier Aron, Mickaël Ferrand, Hélène Brissart, Natacha Forthoffer, Louis Maillard, Fabien Rech","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.JNS24508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) studies have identified a critical region for picture naming, located 3.4 to 6.1 cm from the temporal pole. Its resection during left temporal lobe epilepsy surgery led to postoperative decline in picture naming. However, postoperative anomia has been reported after classic left temporal lobectomy, which rarely extends so posteriorly. The aim of the present study was to evaluate patients' postoperative picture naming outcome on the basis of their precise surgical cavities in light of the recent findings from VLSM studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this monocentric retrospective study, the authors analyzed picture naming outcome and the surgical cavities of 34 patients who underwent surgery for left temporal lobe epilepsy. The authors evaluated their cohort's surgical cavities on the basis of the critical regions identified by VLSM studies as essential to picture naming.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical cavities of patients were anterior to the critical regions for picture naming identified by VLSM studies in the literature. Eight of 11 patients with postoperative lexical access decline at 18 months had a posterior limit of the lesioned voxels that did not reach the critical region identified by VLSM studies. Only 3 of 11 patients with a postoperative picture naming decline had surgical cavities reaching these critical regions. Conversely, 3 of 23 patients with stable or improved postoperative picture naming had surgical cavities reaching these critical regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Keeping a surgical cavity anterior to the limits identified by recent VLSM studies does not protect patients from postoperative picture naming decline. Interindividual anteroposterior variability of the basal temporal language area could complete the explanation offered by VLSM.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS24508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Recent voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) studies have identified a critical region for picture naming, located 3.4 to 6.1 cm from the temporal pole. Its resection during left temporal lobe epilepsy surgery led to postoperative decline in picture naming. However, postoperative anomia has been reported after classic left temporal lobectomy, which rarely extends so posteriorly. The aim of the present study was to evaluate patients' postoperative picture naming outcome on the basis of their precise surgical cavities in light of the recent findings from VLSM studies.

Methods: In this monocentric retrospective study, the authors analyzed picture naming outcome and the surgical cavities of 34 patients who underwent surgery for left temporal lobe epilepsy. The authors evaluated their cohort's surgical cavities on the basis of the critical regions identified by VLSM studies as essential to picture naming.

Results: The surgical cavities of patients were anterior to the critical regions for picture naming identified by VLSM studies in the literature. Eight of 11 patients with postoperative lexical access decline at 18 months had a posterior limit of the lesioned voxels that did not reach the critical region identified by VLSM studies. Only 3 of 11 patients with a postoperative picture naming decline had surgical cavities reaching these critical regions. Conversely, 3 of 23 patients with stable or improved postoperative picture naming had surgical cavities reaching these critical regions.

Conclusions: Keeping a surgical cavity anterior to the limits identified by recent VLSM studies does not protect patients from postoperative picture naming decline. Interindividual anteroposterior variability of the basal temporal language area could complete the explanation offered by VLSM.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信