Mixture of auxinic herbicides for the control of Conyza spp. and its phytotoxic effects on soybean sown in sequence.

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rafael Pessoni Pereira Nascimento Borges, Paulo Vinicius da Silva, Elias Silva de Medeiros, Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Elaine Facco Celin, Caio Haruo Pauluzi Shingu, Lucas Maraus Marostica, Nayane Soares França, Luiz Pedro Lemos Cervo, Munir Mauad, Pedro Antônio Vougodo Salmazo, Patricia Andrea Monquero
{"title":"Mixture of auxinic herbicides for the control of <i>Conyza</i> spp. and its phytotoxic effects on soybean sown in sequence.","authors":"Rafael Pessoni Pereira Nascimento Borges, Paulo Vinicius da Silva, Elias Silva de Medeiros, Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Elaine Facco Celin, Caio Haruo Pauluzi Shingu, Lucas Maraus Marostica, Nayane Soares França, Luiz Pedro Lemos Cervo, Munir Mauad, Pedro Antônio Vougodo Salmazo, Patricia Andrea Monquero","doi":"10.1080/03601234.2025.2455328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The combination of auxin-mimicking herbicides from different chemical groups offers an alternative for controlling fleabane (<i>Conyza</i> spp.) in soybean pre-sowing, but care is needed to avoid phytotoxicity. This study evaluated the effectiveness of auxinic herbicide mixtures in controlling <i>Conyza</i> spp. and their residual effects on soybean plants. A randomized block field experiment tested 13 combinations of auxinic herbicides with glyphosate, followed by glufosinate 14 days after application (DAA). At 42 DAA, all the treatments provided satisfactory control, with triclopyr + halauxifen + diclosulan achieving 100% effectiveness, while the 2,4-D combinations were controlled at 80-90%. Aminopyralid caused the highest phytotoxicity (50-75%), while dicamba caused less than 25% phytotoxicity. Aminopyralid also significantly reduced yield and thousand-grain weight to nearly zero, whereas the other treatments maintained yields of approximately 2,500 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>. These results demonstrate the efficacy of auxinic herbicide combinations for managing <i>Conyza</i> spp., provided that the phytotoxic risks to soybean are carefully managed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","volume":" ","pages":"91-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2025.2455328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of auxin-mimicking herbicides from different chemical groups offers an alternative for controlling fleabane (Conyza spp.) in soybean pre-sowing, but care is needed to avoid phytotoxicity. This study evaluated the effectiveness of auxinic herbicide mixtures in controlling Conyza spp. and their residual effects on soybean plants. A randomized block field experiment tested 13 combinations of auxinic herbicides with glyphosate, followed by glufosinate 14 days after application (DAA). At 42 DAA, all the treatments provided satisfactory control, with triclopyr + halauxifen + diclosulan achieving 100% effectiveness, while the 2,4-D combinations were controlled at 80-90%. Aminopyralid caused the highest phytotoxicity (50-75%), while dicamba caused less than 25% phytotoxicity. Aminopyralid also significantly reduced yield and thousand-grain weight to nearly zero, whereas the other treatments maintained yields of approximately 2,500 kg ha-1. These results demonstrate the efficacy of auxinic herbicide combinations for managing Conyza spp., provided that the phytotoxic risks to soybean are carefully managed.

混配抗氧化除草剂防治黄锈病及其对大豆顺序播种的毒性效应。
不同化学类群的拟生长素类除草剂联合施用,为防治大豆播前草枯提供了一种选择,但需注意避免植物毒性。本研究评价了复合抗氧化除草剂对黄豆灰霉病的防治效果及其在大豆植株上的残留效应。采用随机区组田间试验,试验了13种抗氧化除草剂与草甘膦的配伍,并在施用后14天(DAA)使用草铵膦。在42 DAA时,所有的治疗都提供了满意的控制,三氯吡嗪+哈洛昔芬+双氯sulan达到100%的有效性,而2,4- d联合控制在80-90%。氨基吡啶的植物毒性最高(50-75%),麦草畏的植物毒性低于25%。氨基吡啶也显著降低了产量和千粒重,几乎为零,而其他处理保持了约2500公斤每公顷的产量。这些结果表明,在谨慎管理大豆植物毒性风险的前提下,抗氧化除草剂组合对控制Conyza spp的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: 12 issues per year Abstracted/indexed in: Agricola; Analytical Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; BioSciences Information Service of Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS); CAB Abstracts; CAB AGBiotech News and Information; CAB Irrigation & Drainage Abstracts; CAB Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts; Chemical Abstracts Service Plus; CSA Aluminum Industry Abstracts; CSA ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology and Engineering; CSA ASFA 3 Aquatic Pollution and Environmental Quality; CSA ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts; CSA Ecology Abstracts; CSA Entomology Abstracts; CSA Environmental Engineering Abstracts; CSA Health & Safety Science Abstracts; CSA Pollution Abstracts; CSA Toxicology Abstracts; CSA Water Resource Abstracts; EBSCOhost Online Research Databases; Elsevier BIOBASE/Current Awareness in Biological Sciences; Elsevier Engineering Information: EMBASE/Excerpta Medica/ Engineering Index/COMPENDEX PLUS; Environment Abstracts; Environmental Knowledge; Food Science and Technology Abstracts; Geo Abstracts; Geobase; Food Science; Index Medicus/ MEDLINE; INIST-Pascal/ CNRS; NIOSHTIC; ISI BIOSIS Previews; Pesticides; Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes: Analytical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; PubSCIENCE; Reference Update; Research Alert; Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE); and Water Resources Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信